Pilot corpus only
This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.
Indexed papers
Why this DataRank?
An author's DataRank is the sum of the DataRanks of all 1 indexed paper attributed to them. A prolific author with many moderate-impact papers can outrank one with a single high-impact paper.
Author scores recompute whenever paper DataRanks are refreshed, so this number lags the underlying paper scores by at most one batch run.
Read the full methodology →Top data-sharing exemplar
The highest-impact dataset this researcher has shared, ranked by DataRank — the single contribution doing the most to lift their data-sharing standing.
Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods, Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner
Papers
Driven by 8 papers — median percentile 0. Top paper: “Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: an analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities”.
Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods, Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner
Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods
Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods
Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Helen Buckley Woods, Ludo Waltman
Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought
Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Stephen Pinfield, Helen Buckley Woods, Ludo Waltman
Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: An analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities
Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods, Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner
Stephen Pinfield, Ludo Waltman, Helen Buckley Woods, Johanna Brumberg, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner