Sven E. Hug

Decision SciencesHealth ProfessionsMedicine

Pilot corpus only

This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.

Top 100%percentile

0Author DataRank

Indexed papers

0in pilot corpus

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Papers

Driven by 4 papers. Top paper: “A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants”.

A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants

Journal of Informetrics(2011)10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006

N/A

0.852DataRank · unranked

291 citations

Rüdiger Mutz, Sven E. Hug, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Lutz Bornmann

The concordance of field-normalized scores based on Web of Science and Microsoft Academic data: A case study in computer sciences

STI 2018 Conference Proceedings(2018)10.48550/arxiv.1802.10141

N/A

0.345DataRank · unranked

9 citations

Robin Haunschild, Sven E. Hug, Lutz Bornmann, Thomas Scheidsteger

Bibliometrics-based heuristics: What is their definition and how can they be studied? - Research note

El profesional de la información(2020)10.3145/epi.2020.jul.20

N/A

0.208DataRank · unranked

3 citations

Sven E. Hug, Lutz Bornmann

How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review

arXiv (Cornell University)(2023)10.48550/arxiv.2312.04569

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

1 citations

Sven E. Hug