Clinton Castro

Social SciencesNeuroscience

Pilot corpus only

This score is computed over theSindex pilot corpus and does not cover the full scientific literature. Scores are relative to papers we have ingested — papers, authors, and institutions outside the pilot are not represented. Methodology.

Top 100%percentile

0Author DataRank

Indexed papers

0in pilot corpus

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Papers

Driven by 3 papers. Top paper: “What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?”.

What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?

Utilitas(2021)10.1017/s095382082100011x

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

83 citations

Nikhil Venkatesh, Torbjörn Tännsjö, Christian Tarsney, H. Orri Stefánsson, Katie Steele +24 more

Engaging an advisory board in discussions about the ethical relevance of algorithmic bias and fairness

npj Digital Medicine(2025)10.1038/s41746-025-01711-1

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

2 citations

Larry Au, Clinton Castro, Gabriel Odom, Laura Brandt

From Clinical Trials to Real‐World Impact: Introducing a Computational Framework to Detect Endpoint Bias in Opioid Use Disorder Research

Drug and Alcohol Review(2025)10.1111/dar.70085

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

0 citations

Laura Brandt, Alexander J. Marker, Salvatore Giorgi, Ganesh Jainarain, H. Andrew Schwartz +3 more