How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care is a research paper published in JAMA (2014). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.916. It has been cited 448 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.916
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →Swiss National Science Foundation
Grant: 155290
Development of Generic Decision Aids Linked to Recommendations in Guidelines to Promote Shared Decision Making in the Clinical Encounter
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
FWCI
37.68
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Additional file 1 of Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
Additional file 1 of Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
Additional file 2 of Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
Additional file 2 of Systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in indexed Portuguese medical journals: time trends and critical appraisal
Additional file 1 of Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies
Additional file 1 of Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies
Additional file 1 of Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study
Additional file 1 of Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study
Additional file 2 of Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study
Additional file 2 of Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on health effects of air pollutants were higher than extreme temperatures: a comparative study
Additional file 1 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 1 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 2 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 2 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 3 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 3 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 4 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 4 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 5 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis
Additional file 5 of Quality of life of pediatric and adult individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta: a meta-analysis