Purkinje Cell Loss in Essential Tremor: Collective Data From 215 Brains Over a 21‐Year Period is a dataset published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.275, placing it in the top 57.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 5 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 57% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No persistent identifier string from any accepted scheme is given for the dataset; the only identifier is the paper's own DOI.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No repository is named as the holder of the data; the data are to be obtained from the authors.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No identifier for the dataset appears in either the reference list or the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The authors will make their data available to other investigators for the purpose of replication and re‐use.”
The statement exists but does not point to a repository record; it is a promise to share, not a link to archived data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset's content is described in running prose but not in an itemised inventory; the sentence states what the data contain. The sentence is: [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only route to obtain the data is asking the authors, which is a discretionary human request, not a followable process with no precondition. The statement is:
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“a_controlled_access_for_sensitive”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not label the access level of the data in any controlled vocabulary term; the only mention is a discretionary offer to share. The data availability statement is: [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The authors will make their data available to other investigators for the purpose of replication and re‐use.”
The data are human-subject but no institutional gatekeeper is named; the only access route is through the authors, a natural person. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No sentence in the paper states when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No file format is named for the data; the data are numerical counts, but the paper does not specify a format for any released file.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No named community standard, ontology, or checklist is applied to the data; the paper uses standard histological terms but no registered standard.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No identifier for an external resource used by the study is given; the paper names brain repositories but without accession numbers or DOIs for the tissues used.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No reuse license is named for the data; the CC BY-NC-ND license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No version token or date is given for the dataset to identify a specific snapshot.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not mention any code written by the authors; it only names commercial software (SPSS, GraphPad Prism) used for analysis.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“NINDS #R01 NS086736 and NINDS #R01 NS117745”
Grant numbers are attached to named funders (NIH). [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific stains and microscope magnifications used to produce the data. The sentence is: [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“a_access_conditions_stated”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No documentation file is said to accompany the data; the definitions of variables are given inside the article in the methods section. The sentence defining PC linear density is: [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
5.95 × 10⁻³
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 5 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: NINDS #R01 NS086736
National Institutes of Health
Grant: NINDS #R01 NS117745
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS086736
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS117745
FWCI
3.72
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords