Multi‐polygenic scores in psychiatry: From disorder specific to transdiagnostic perspectives is a dataset published in American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.456, placing it in the top 41.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 11 times, with 9 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 41% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier or accession number for the dataset is given anywhere in the text.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from MIND-Set study.”
MIND-Set study is a named host, but it is not a curated repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears in the reference list or in the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from MIND-Set study. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of MIND-Set study.”
The data availability statement points to a third party (MIND-Set study) with restrictions, not to a repository record. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The study sample ( n = 513) was deeply phenotyped, consisting of 452 patients from tertiary care with mood disorders, anxiety disorders (ANX), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorders, and/or substance use disorders (SUD) and 61 unaffected comparison individuals.”
The dataset's content and size are described in a single sentence in running prose, with no section, table, or enumerated list itemising files or variables. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of MIND-Set study.”
The only access route is a discretionary request to the authors with a precondition, which is not a followable process.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Restrictions apply to the availability of these data”
The paper states that restrictions apply to the data, but does not use an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data are available from the author(s) with the permission of MIND-Set study.”
The gatekeeper is the author(s) (natural persons) and the MIND-Set study, not an institutional committee or repository. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence in the paper states when the data become available or how long they are retained.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format for the released data is mentioned anywhere in the text.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No community standard (ontology, checklist, schema) is named for the data; only diagnostic frameworks (DSM, ICD, RDoC) are mentioned, which are not data standards. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (accession, DOI, RRID) for an external resource (e.g., GWAS summary statistics, reference genome) is explicitly given in the text; only citations to papers are present. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license is stated for the data; the CC BY license applies to the article only.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the dataset.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability is mentioned; only third-party tools are named.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Grant no. EINF1824”
Award numbers are provided for specific funders. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The MIND-SET cohort was genotyped on the Infinium Global Screening Array (GSA-24 v3.0).”
The paper names the specific genotyping array and software tools used to produce the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Table S3 provides an overview of these questionnaires and their subscales used in the subsequent factor analysis.”
Variable definitions are provided in a supplementary table inside the article, not in a documentation object shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.373
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0828
From 6 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 9 citers.
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
Grant: 25034
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Grant: NNF20OC0065561
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R248‐2017‐2003
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R155‐2014‐1724
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R102‐A9118
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R344‐2020‐1060
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: R01MH124851
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: 1R01MH124851‐01
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: 1U01MH109514‐01
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: U01 MH109514
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R344-2020-1060
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R155-2014-1724
Lundbeck Foundation
Grant: R248-2017-2003
European Commission
Grant: 667302
Comorbid Conditions of Attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01MH124851-01
2/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Advancing Discovery and Impact
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01MH109514-01
5/7 Psychiatric Genomics Consortium: Finding actionable variation
European Commission
Grant: 847879
Prevention and Remediation of Insulin Multimorbidity in Europe
Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
FWCI
2.39
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals