Cognitively defined Alzheimer's dementia subgroups have distinct atrophy patterns is a dataset published in Alzheimer s & Dementia (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.668, placing it in the top 29.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 19 times, with 16 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 30% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) for the study's own dataset (subgroup lists or code).
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The study's own dataset is not deposited in a named repository; it is available on request from the authors.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears anywhere in the paper, neither in the reference list nor in the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data analyzed in this paper are available from the ADNI website (www.adni.loni.usc.edu). Analytic code for all steps is available on request, as are lists of participants assigned to each subgroup.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
For the study's own data (code and subgroup lists), the availability statement points to the authors on request, which is Colavizza category 1 (partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not provide an itemised inventory of the study's own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Analytic code for all steps is available on request, as are lists of participants assigned to each subgroup.”
The only route to the study's own data is a discretionary request to a person, which is not a followable access route (class 3).
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not label the access level of the study's own data (subgroup lists and code) with any term from the COAR vocabulary. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The study's own data (subgroup lists) are available only on request from the authors—a personal gatekeeper, not an institutional one. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper states no timing or persistence commitment for the study's own data (subgroup lists or code).
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not name any file format for the released data (subgroup lists).
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, GO) is named for the study's own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier is given for any external resource that the study's own data depend on; the ADNI URL is not a persistent identifier. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license is named for the study's own data; the CC BY license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper gives no version token or date for the study's own dataset (subgroup lists).
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Analytic code for all steps is available on request, as are lists of participants assigned to each subgroup.”
The code is offered only via a discretionary request to the authors, not via a machine-resolvable locator.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Numbers: R01AG 029672, U01 AG024904; Department of Defense, Grant/Award Number: W81XWH-12-2-0012”
Specific award/grant numbers are provided for the funding sources. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“We used bifactor confirmatory factor analysis approaches using Mplus 20 to generate composite scores for each domain.”
The paper names a specific software tool (Mplus 20) used to produce the data, which is class yes. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, data dictionary, codebook) is mentioned as accompanying the study's own data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.449
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.219
From 8 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 16 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01AG 029672
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U01 AG024904
U.S. Department of Defense
Grant: W81XWH‐12‐2‐0012
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG068193
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U24 AG021886
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U19 AG024904
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Genentech
H. Lundbeck A/S
National Institute on Aging
Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
Biogen
Alzheimer's Association
NIBIB NIH HHS
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
BioClinica
Merck
Pfizer
AbbVie
F. Hoffmann-La Roche
Fujirebio Europe
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Servier
Alzheimer's Association
CIHR
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Eli Lilly and Company
GE Healthcare
MeSH Terms
Keywords