EEG‐based information transfer paths during motion discrimination: Detectable differences between normal cognition and MCI is a dataset published in Alzheimer s & Dementia (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 77.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 25/100.
Ranks in the top 78% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, URN, or repository accession) is given for the dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
No repository is named; the data are held within the article itself. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the text, either in the body or in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
The statement points to the article itself, not to a repository record, corresponding to Colavizza category 2.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The current dataset includes 56 consensus-diagnosed, community-dwelling American seniors (ages 60–90 years, 28 normal cognition [NC]; 28 mild cognitive impairment [MCI])”
The dataset content is described in running prose, not in an itemized inventory (section, table, or list).
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
The data are stated to be available within the article, which is openly accessible with no precondition.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
No explicit access-level label is applied to the data; the statement describes an action (available within the article/supplementary) from which the level must be inferred. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
The data are openly available within the article, so no gatekeeper (institutional or personal) is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials.”
The statement indicates availability now but does not specify how long the data will persist. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“All participants were diagnosed through the MADRC consensus conference using the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) version 3.”
The NACC UDS is a community standard for clinical data, and the International 10-20 System is a standard for electrode placement. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Sun B. MATLAB code for the implementation of the cCCM algorithm. GitHub, 2024. https://github.com/BAWC‐Evan‐Sun/CCM‐Implement”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper cites a GitHub repository URL for the code used in the analysis, which is a qualified reference to an external resource. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is explicitly applied to the data; the article's CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license applies to the paper, not the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given to identify the snapshot of the data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Sun B. MATLAB code for the implementation of the cCCM algorithm. GitHub, 2024. https://github.com/BAWC‐Evan‐Sun/CCM‐Implement”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
A machine-resolvable GitHub URL is provided for the study's own code. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under award 2032709; the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards R21‐AG046637, R01‐AG054484, P30AG024824, P30AG053760, and P30AG072931; the Alzheimer's Association under award HAT‐07‐60437.”
Specific award numbers are provided for each funder.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Brain Vision equipment was used to record scalp EEG activity with a non-invasive high-density actiCap (64 active electrodes), modified according to the International 10-20 System.”
The paper names specific instruments and equipment (Brain Vision, actiCap) used to produce the data.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The demographic information of our participants is presented in the demographic table, featured in Figure 1A.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided inside the article (Figure 1A and supplementary tables), not as a separate documentation object shipped with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →National Science Foundation
Grant: 2032709
CCSS: Brain Network Analysis Using Communication Theory
Alzheimer's Association
Grant: HAT‐07‐60437
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG072931
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Grant: R21-AG046637
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Grant: P30AG024824
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Grant: P30AG053760
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Grant: R01-AG054484
Alzheimer's Association
Grant: HAT-07-60437
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG054484
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R21 AG046637
FWCI
0.77
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords