🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology(2012)10.1002/asi.22708Source: DataRank Database
Top 9%percentile
17.7DataRank
17.7Top 9%
Dataset
446 citations · base score 6.1
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology
›Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (0/2)
    Interoperable (0/2)
      Reusable (1/3)
      • Dataset classification

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 5%Citation Network 95%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.913

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      16.7

      From 180 citing papers with measurable signal

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →

      Top citers

      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 5% comes from its base citations and 95% from the citation network (180 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Authors (10)

      Clara Calero‐MedinaORCID,Joost KostenORCID,Nees Jan van EckORCID,Thed N. van LeeuwenORCID,Martijn S. VisserORCID

      Related Papers