Association of cancer with neuropathological markers of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias is a dataset published in Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 77.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 78% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier for the paper's own dataset is given.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“the corresponding author can provide a curated dataset of the currently used data in spreadsheet format.”
The holder named for the curated dataset is the corresponding author, a natural person, not a repository.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the curated dataset appears anywhere in the paper.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data analyzed were retrieved from the NACC data repository. Access to these data can be requested via the NACC website (https://naccdata.org/). Once a request has been approved, the corresponding author can provide a curated dataset of the currently used data in spreadsheet format.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a request-based route (Colavizza category 1), not a repository record, so the verdict is partial. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“We retrieved 2288 cases from the National Alzheimer Coordinating Center (NACC) cohort with available information on cancer diagnoses and neuropathological scoring of Braak stages, Thal amyloid phases, neuritic plaques, TDP-43 pathology, and Lewy body pathology.”
The dataset content is described in running prose, not in an itemised inventory. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Access to these data can be requested via the NACC website (https://naccdata.org/). Once a request has been approved, the corresponding author can provide a curated dataset of the currently used data in spreadsheet format.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The access route requires a request approval, which is a stated precondition, so the verdict is partial. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Access to these data can be requested via the NACC website (https://naccdata.org/). Once a request has been approved, the corresponding author can provide a curated dataset of the currently used data in spreadsheet format.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes an access action (request approval) but applies no explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary, so the verdict is partial. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“the corresponding author can provide a curated dataset of the currently used data in spreadsheet format.”
The gatekeeper named for the curated dataset is the corresponding author, a natural person. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format token is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No proper-noun data or metadata standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS) is named and applied to the study's data; only generic scoring scales are used. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the NACC database (https://naccdata.org).”
The paper gives a repository URL for the NACC data, a resource other than its own dataset. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence for the data is named; the article's CC-BY-NC licence applies to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date pins the curated dataset.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“An R script providing sample code for the Bayesian ordinal regression model is included in the file “annotated_sample_code_ordinal_regression_R.pdf”.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The code is provided in supplementary material, not a versioned repository. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“The NACC database is funded by NIA/NIH Grant U24 AG072122.”
A grant number is given for the resource used, but not for the study's own funding. However, the paper also lists multiple P30 grants for ADRCs, which are award numbers. The strongest artefact is the grant number U24 AG072122. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The study used existing NACC data and does not describe the production of its own curated dataset with specific instruments or kits; the methods describe analysis only. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object accompanying the data is named; variable definitions are not provided in a table or appendix.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG062421-03
Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG066508-03
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG072977-02
NORTHWESTERN Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U24AG072122-03
National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066530-04S1
Alzheimer Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30AG066546-01A1
South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066514-01S1
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30AG066506-01
1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG062677-02
Mayo Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30AG072958-01
Duke/UNC Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG072947-02
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066509-03S1
Biological heterogeneity in ADRD
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG062422-03
New Approaches to Dementia Heterogeneity
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG062715-02
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG072946-02S1
Portable and modular UDS Data Collection software to increase collaboration and engagement of Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center research software engineers
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P20AG068082-02
Vanderbilt Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG066515-03
Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066519-01S1
The Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at the University of California, Irvine
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG062429-03
UCSD Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers P30
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066468-01S1
Comparison of tau-PET tracers: Progress towards a universal measure
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P30AG066511-03S2
Piloting a web-based neuropathology image resource for the ADRC community
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30AG072931-01
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5P30AG072959-02
Cleveland Alzheimers Disease Research Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1P30AG072973-01
University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (KU ADRC)
FWCI
0.78
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords