Factor Structure, Internal Consistency, and Measurement Invariance of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) in Transgender and Gender‐Diverse Adults is a dataset published in International Journal of Eating Disorders (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.312, placing it in the top 53.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 7 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 6/100.
Ranks in the top 54% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper gives a web address (URL) but no persistent identifier from a recognised PID scheme. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The PRIDE Study is a cohort study, not a repository from the re3data/FAIRsharing list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset identifier (URL) appears only in the body text, not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a third-party controlled access procedure, not a repository record (Colavizza category 3). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The EPSI is a 45-item self-report measure designed to evaluate a wide range of eating disorder psychopathology across eight subscales: Body Dissatisfaction (7 items), Binge Eating (8 items), Cognitive Restraint (3 items), Purging (6 items), Restricting (6 items), Excessive Exercise (5 items), Muscle Building (5 items), and Negative Attitudes Toward Obesity (5 items) (Forbush et al. 2013).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset content is described in running prose, not as an itemised inventory. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The access route requires an application, which is a specified precondition, thus 'partial'. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes the access action but does not use an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data from The PRIDE Study may be accessed through an Ancillary Study application (details at pridestudy.org/collaborate).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are from human subjects, and the gatekeeper is an institutional review process (Ancillary Study application), satisfying the 'yes' class. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No persistence commitment or availability timing is stated.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named; the EPSI instrument is not a FAIRsharing-registered standard.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier (DOI, accession, RRID, etc.) for an external resource appears in the text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence or terms of use are stated for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“administered between July 2023 and January 2024”
A date range is given for data collection, which pins the snapshot without a version token. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is provided; code availability is not addressed.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“J.M.N. was funded by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2022056).”
Award numbers are given for multiple funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analyses were conducted using R (version 4.4.0).”
The paper names specific software and version tokens used for data analysis. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The EPSI is a 45-item self-report measure designed to evaluate a wide range of eating disorder psychopathology across eight subscales: Body Dissatisfaction (7 items), Binge Eating (8 items), Cognitive Restraint (3 items), Purging (6 items), Restricting (6 items), Excessive Exercise (5 items), Muscle Building (5 items), and Negative Attitudes Toward Obesity (5 items) (Forbush et al. 2013).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided within the article's method section, not as a separate accompanying documentation object. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.312
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Grant: 2022056
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: R61MH133710
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Grant: FONDECYT Nº 11240740
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Grant: PPRN-1501-26848
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Grant: PPRN‐1501‐26848
FWCI
9.46
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals