Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake from the 6 Min Walk Test in Patients with Heart Failure

ESC Heart Failure(2020)10.1002/ehf2.13167Source: DataRank Database

Predicting Maximal Oxygen Uptake from the 6 Min Walk Test in Patients with Heart Failure is a research paper published in ESC Heart Failure (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 29 times.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access29 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

nct

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (2 grants)Impact (FWCI 4.01)OA: goldTopics (45)Linked Datasets (6)DataCite Reuse (6)IDs (PubMed, PMC, OpenAlex)Annotations (1)SDGs (2)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (2/2)

Has DOI
Indexed in repositories

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (2/2)

DataCite relations
Linked datasets

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (7)

Bunny Pozehl ORCID,Dola Pathak ORCID,Mark A. Williams ORCID,Joseph Norman ORCID,Windy Alonso ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:33305534 PMC:PMC7835615 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W3111432936

National Institutes of Health

Grant: R01HL112979

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 4R01HL112979-05

Heart Camp: Promoting Adherence to Exercise in Patients with Heart Failure

FWCI

4.01

Citation Percentile

0.9%

Citation Trend

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

goldLicense: CC BY NC ND

journalhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ehf2.13167

publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/ehf2.13167

publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ehf2.13167

publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ehf2.13167

publisherhttps://academic.oup.com/eschf/article-pdf/8/1/47/65798809/eschf_8_1_47.pdf

Fields of Study

Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Effects of Exercise03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineExercise TestHeart FailureHumansOxygenOxygen ConsumptionWalk Test

MeSH Terms

Walk TestExercise TestHeart FailureHumansOxygenOxygen Consumption

Keywords

Heart failureMedicineVO2 maxStandard errorMathematicsLimits of agreementInternal medicineGold standard (test)Correlation coefficientStatisticsCardiologyNuclear medicineHeart ratePredictionPeak Vo2Cardiopulmonary Testing6 Min Walk TestIdrottsvetenskap och fitnessWalk TestHeart failure; Cardiopulmonary testing; 6 min walk test; Prediction; Peak VO2OxygenOxygen ConsumptionRC666-701Original Research ArticlesExercise TestDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemHumansSport and Fitness Sciences

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3: 3. Good healthSDG 0: Good health and well-being

Additional file 1 of Comparison of 6-min walk test distance vs. estimated maximum oxygen consumption for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118973.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118973figshare

Additional file 2 of Comparison of 6-min walk test distance vs. estimated maximum oxygen consumption for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118976.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118976figshare

Additional file 3 of Comparison of 6-min walk test distance vs. estimated maximum oxygen consumption for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118979.v1figshare

10.6084/m9.figshare.23118979figshare