Copy Number Variation and Structural Genomic Findings in 116 Cases of Sudden Unexplained Death between 1 and 28 Months of Age is a dataset published in Advanced Genetics (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.281, placing it in the top 56.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 57% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, repository accession) is assigned to the study's own dataset anywhere in the text.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the data; the data are stated to be available on request from the corresponding author.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, so it cannot be cited in the reference list or body text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.”
The statement points to a person (corresponding author), not to a repository record, matching Colavizza category 1.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Chromosomal microarray (CMA) data are generated for 116 SUDP cases with age at death between 1 and 28 months.”
The dataset's content is stated in running prose, not in an itemised inventory. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.”
The only route offered is a discretionary request to a person, which is not a followable access procedure and is therefore scored as 'no'.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.”
The paper labels the access level as 'not publicly available', which is a natural-language synonym for 'restricted access'. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.”
The data are sensitive human-subject data, and the only gatekeeper named is the corresponding author (a natural person), with no institutional committee or process specified.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The text contains no statement about when the data become available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data; the data are not deposited, and no format token appears.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“CNVs are classified using the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines”
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines are a registered community standard for CNV classification, which qualifies as a data/metadata standard. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“CNV coordinates were based on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37, GRCh37 (hg19).”
A reference genome build identifier (GRCh37/hg19) is given for a resource other than the study's own data. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence artefact is attached to the data; the CC BY license applies to the article, not the data, and the data are not publicly available.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date is provided to identify a specific snapshot of the data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not mention code availability, and no locator for the study's own code is given.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was funded by the Robert's Program on Sudden Unexplained Death in Pediatrics, the Jude Zayac Foundation, NIH/NICHD K23HD102589, R01 HD 090064, R01 HD 020991, the Boston Children's Hospital Intellectual and the Developmental Disabilities Research Center Molecular Genetics Core Facility supported by P50HD105351 from the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and NIH/NIMH U01 MH119690.”
The text provides specific grant numbers (e.g., K23HD102589, R01 HD 090064, P50HD105351, U01 MH119690) attached to named funders.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Genomic DNA was extracted from tissue specimens or blood using standard protocols (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and MagNA Pure Compact System (Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA). Dye‐swap array‐CGH (comparative genomic hybridization) experiments were performed according to experimental procedures described by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA) using Agilent 4 × 180 K Surescan arrays. Data analysis was performed using Agilent Cytogenomics Software (Agilent Cytogenomics v3.0.6.6).”
The text names specific instruments, kits, and software versions used to produce the data (Agilent arrays, MagNA Pure system, Agilent Cytogenomics v3.0.6.6). [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, data dictionary, codebook) is named as accompanying the data, and no variable-definition table is provided inside the article. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0401
From 2 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 2 citers.
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HD020991
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: K23 HD102589
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: P50 HD105351
NICHD NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HD090064
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: U01 MH119690
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: K08 HL150284
Keywords