Predicting alcohol dependence from multi‐site brain structural measures is a dataset published in Human Brain Mapping (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.547, placing it in the top 35.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 18 times, with 10 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 36% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) is given for the dataset anywhere in the text.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“rationale”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The ENIGMA Addiction Consortium is named as holder, but it is not a data repository. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper; the dataset is not cited in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data Availability Statement: Data was gathered by the Enigma Addiction Consortium (https://www.enigmaaddictionconsortium.com/). Sharing data publically is not possible due to privacy concerns around protected information, but interested researchers should contact the Enigma Addiction Consortium for more information at [email protected].”
The data-availability statement points to a contact email and a website, not a repository record, thus it is category 1 (available on request from a person/organization). [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“In total, we employ 150 different measurements representing cortical mean thickness (n = 68) and surface area (n = 68) along with subcortical volume (n = 14).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset content is described in running prose without an itemised inventory section, table, or list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“interested researchers should contact the Enigma Addiction Consortium for more information at [email protected].”
The only route to access the data is a discretionary request to the Enigma Addiction Consortium, which is not a followable route with a defined process.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“rationale”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No access-level label is applied to the data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“rationale”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are sensitive, and the gatekeeper is the ENIGMA Addiction Consortium, which is a third party but not a named institutional process. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state when the data are available or how long they persist; it only mentions that data cannot be shared publicly and provides a contact email.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data; the data are not publicly available, so no format is specified.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, GO) is named; only FreeSurfer and Desikan parcellation are mentioned, which are not community standards in the sense of FAIRsharing-registered standards. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Code used in the evolutionary search, along with most postanalysis code is provided at https://github.com/sahahn/Alc_Dep.”
The paper provides a URL for the study's own code, which is a resource other than the dataset, and also cites Mackey et al. 2019 (though without an explicit DOI in the text). [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No licence is stated for the dataset; the Creative Commons Attribution License applies only to the article, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is provided for the dataset; the data are referred to without a snapshot identifier.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Code used in the evolutionary search, along with most postanalysis code is provided at https://github.com/sahahn/Alc_Dep.”
A machine-resolvable code repository URL is given for the study's own code. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was made possible by NIDA grant R01DA047119 awarded to Dr. Garavan.”
The paper provides specific grant numbers (e.g., R01DA047119) attached to named funders. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Participants' structural T1 weighted brain MRI scans were first analyzed using FreeSurfer 5.3 which automatically segments 7 bilateral subcortical regions of interest (ROIs) and parcellates the cortex into 34 bilateral ROIs according to the Desikan parcellation.”
The paper names the specific software (FreeSurfer 5.3) used to produce the data. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, codebook, data dictionary) is named, and variable definitions are not provided in a table or appendix within the article.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.442
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.106
From 9 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 10 citers.
Division of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
Grant: OAC‐1827314
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: R01 DA018307
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Grant: R01‐AA013892
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Grant: ZIA AA000125‐04 DICB
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: PL30‐1DA024859‐01
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: R01‐DA014100
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: R01‐DA020726
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: R01DA047119
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: T32DA043593
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: UL1‐RR24925‐01
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U54 EB020403
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: VICI grant 453.08.01
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: VIDI grant 016.08.322
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: ZonMW grant 31160003
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: ZonMW grant 31160004
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: ZonMW grant 31180002
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Grant: ZonMW grant 91676084
NIH HHS
Grant: UL1-RR24925-01
Intramural NIH HHS
Grant: ZIA AA000125
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: R01-DA020726
ZonMw
Grant: 91676084
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DA020726
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: R01-DA014100
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR001863
NIAAA NIH HHS
Grant: ZIA AA000125-04 DICB
ZonMw
Grant: 31160003
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DA014100
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: PL30-1DA024859-01
NIAAA NIH HHS
Grant: R01-AA013892
NCRR NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 RR024925
ZonMw
Grant: 31160004
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: PL1 DA024859
ZonMw
Grant: 31180002
NIAAA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AA013892
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01DA020726-03
Neural Systems, Inhibitory Control, and Methamphetamine Dependence
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2R01AA013892-11
Chronic Alcohol and Brain Stress Circuit Response
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01DA047119-02
ENIGMA- Addiction: Pooling of Existing Datasets to Identify Brain and Genetic Correlates of Addiction
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1UL1RR024925-01
Interdisciplinary Research on Stress, Self-Control &Addiction
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U54EB020403-04S1
ENIGMA Center for Worldwide Medicine, Imaging & Genomics
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1R01DA018307-01
STIMULANT DEPENDENCE: NEURAL MECHANISMS OF RELAPSE
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5T32DA043593-03
Training in Complex Systems and Data Science Approaches Applied to the Neurobiology of Drug Use
National Science Foundation
Grant: 1827314
MRI: Acquisition of a GPU Accelerated Vermont Advanced Computing Core
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1ZIAAA000125-01
Neuroimaging of Alcohol Addiction
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Grant: 1117188
Enhancing and integrating addiction neuroscience knowledge with clinical practice, by transforming the approach to assessment and classification protocols, and improving outcomes by using neurocognitive phenotypes for tailored treatments
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5T32DA043593-05
Training in Complex Systems and Data Science Approaches Applied to the Neurobiology of Drug Use
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U54EB020403-03
ENIGMA Center for Worldwide Medicine, Imaging & Genomics
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R01DA014100-01S1
The Role of Executive Functions in Cocaine Abuse
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5PL1DA024859-02
Human Subjects Core: Protocols, Statistics, Collaborative Method Development and
Philip Morris International
FWCI
1.09
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals