Mental health in the UK Biobank: A roadmap to self‐report measures and neuroimaging correlates is a dataset published in Human Brain Mapping (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.6, placing it in the top 12.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 74 times, with 57 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 21/100.
Ranks in the top 13% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier (DOI, Handle, ARK, or repository accession) is given for the study's own dataset (derived variables or code) [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“All analysis code for this article is available at: https://github.com/PersonomicsLab/MH_in_UKB”
The paper names GitHub as the host for the code, which is a non-repository host (not a curated data repository) [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
The dataset (derived variables) is not cited in the reference list nor appears as a reference entry; only the code is linked in the body text [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analysis code for this article is available at: https://github.com/PersonomicsLab/MH_in_UKB . UKB data (Miller et al., 2016 ; Sudlow et al., 2015 ) are available following an access application process, for more information please see: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access . In accordance with the UKB regulations, newly derived variables in this article (e.g., RDS‐4) will be made available to other researchers via UKB data access post‐publication.”
The statement points to a third-party access process (UK Biobank) for the data, not a repository record for the study's own dataset [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
No itemised inventory of the released dataset (files, variables, or samples) is provided; the paper describes the study variables but not as a dataset description [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“UKB data (Miller et al., 2016 ; Sudlow et al., 2015) are available following an access application process, for more information please see: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access . In accordance with the UKB regulations, newly derived variables in this article (e.g., RDS-4) will be made available to other researchers via UKB data access post‐publication.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The text gives a followable access process (application) with a precondition, not unconditional availability. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“UKB data (Miller et al., 2016 ; Sudlow et al., 2015) are available following an access application process, for more information please see: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-access . In accordance with the UKB regulations, newly derived variables in this article (e.g., RDS-4) will be made available to other researchers via UKB data access post‐publication.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The text describes an access action (access application process) but does not apply an explicit access-level label to the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“UKB data (Miller et al., 2016 ; Sudlow et al., 2015 ) are available following an access application process”
The paper names an institutional gatekeeper (UK Biobank access application process) for the data [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“newly derived variables in this article (e.g., RDS‐4) will be made available to other researchers via UKB data access post‐publication”
The paper states when the data become available (post-publication) but does not state how long they persist [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data (derived variables or code)
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, ontology) is named for the released data
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“This research was performed under UK Biobank application number 47267.”
The paper gives an identifier (UK Biobank application number 47267) for an external resource (the data access approval)
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is stated for the data (derived variables or code); the CC BY license applies to the article only
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the released data (derived variables or code)
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“All analysis code for this article is available at: https://github.com/PersonomicsLab/MH_in_UKB”
The paper gives a machine-resolvable locator (GitHub URL) for the study's own code
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“National Institute of Health, USA (NIH), Grant/Award Number: 1 R34 NS118618‐01”
The paper provides a grant number for a named funder
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“MRI data were obtained using a Siemens Magnetom Skyra 3 T scanner.”
The paper names specific instruments and software used to produce the data [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“In our study, we proposed a new summary measure of state depression using UKB questions included in the Assessment center information: Recent Depressive Symptoms (RDS‐4), which is a continuous measure of depression symptomatology obtained on the day of scanning.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided inside the article, not in a separate documentation object that travels with the data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.648
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.963
From 32 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 57 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 R34 NS118618‐01
NIH HHS
Grant: 1 R34 NS118618-01
Understanding overlap in resting state fMRI networks at the single cell level: a cross-species approach
Medical Research Council
Grant: MC_QA137853
Medical Research Council
Grant: MC_PC_17228
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R34 NS118618
McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience
FWCI
4.53
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Influential Citations
3
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals