Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

A comparison of methods in estimating population attributable risk for colorectal cancer in the United States

International Journal of Cancer(2021)10.1002/ijc.33489Source: DataRank Database

A comparison of methods in estimating population attributable risk for colorectal cancer in the United States is a research paper published in International Journal of Cancer (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.457. It has been cited 20 times.

N/A

0.457DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access20 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

Linked data & code

doi

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (14 grants)Impact (FWCI 1.46)OA: greenTopics (66)IDs (PubMed, PMC, OpenAlex)Annotations (1)SDGs (3)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

0.457

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (4)

Kai Wang ORCID,Mingyang Song ORCID,Edward L. Giovannucci ORCID,Hanseul Kim ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:33527363 PMC:PMC8058283 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W3126293909

American Cancer Society

Grant: MRSG‐17‐220‐01

National Institutes of Health

Grant: P01 CA55075

National Institutes of Health

Grant: P01 CA87969

National Institutes of Health

Grant: R00 CA215314

National Institutes of Health

Grant: U01 CA167552

National Institutes of Health

Grant: UM1 CA167552

National Institutes of Health

Grant: UM1 CA186107

NCI NIH HHS

Grant: P01 CA087969

NCI NIH HHS

Grant: P01 CA055075

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 2U01CA167552-06

Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health Professionals

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5R00CA215314-04

Marine Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid, Gut Microbiome, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 3P01CA055075-10S1

PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIET AND CANCER IN MEN (HEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOLLOWUP)

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 3P01CA087969-03S1

DIET, HORMONES AND RISK OF COLORECTAL CANCERS

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5UM1CA186107-05

Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health Study

FWCI

1.46

Citation Percentile

0.8%

Citation Trend

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

greenLicense: Wiley Online Library User Agreement

repositoryhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8058283

publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ijc.33489

publisherhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ijc.33489

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33489

Fields of Study

Cancer Risks and FactorsColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineAdultAge DistributionAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexColorectal NeoplasmsExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRisk AssessmentUnited States

MeSH Terms

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalUnited StatesColorectal NeoplasmsExerciseBody Mass IndexAge DistributionRisk Assessment

Keywords

MedicineAttributable riskColorectal cancerRelative riskRed meatConcordanceBody mass indexPopulationDemographyEnvironmental healthCancerInternal medicineConfidence intervalPathologyPreventionPopulation Attributable FractionPopulation Attributable RiskAdultAged, 80 and overMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAge DistributionHumansFemaleColorectal NeoplasmsExerciseLife StyleAged

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 2: 2. Zero hungerSDG 3: 3. Good healthSDG 0: Good health and well-being

A comparison of methods in estimating population attributable risk for colorectal cancer in the United States

FAIR Checklist

DataRank Breakdown

Authors (4)

Funding (14 grants)

Impact

Open Access

Topics

Annotations (Europe PMC)