Transparent and complete reporting of confounding in observational research is a research paper published in JCPP Advances (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.534. It has been cited 12 times, with 5 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
AbstractImproved understanding of causal risk factors for child and adolescent mental health problems are dependent on observational research. Although confounding is a major limitation of observational research, this problem is widely ignored in the reporting and dissemination of findings from observational studies in psychiatric journals. There is clearly a need for improved reporting of confounding and more careful interpretation of observational research in psychiatry.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.385
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.149
From 4 citing papers with measurable signal
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 72% comes from its base citations and 28% from the citation network (4 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.