Validation of CBCL depression scores of adolescents in three independent datasets is a dataset published in JCPP Advances (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.269, placing it in the top 58.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 5 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 13/100.
Ranks in the top 58% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier string in a recognised scheme is given for the paper's own data.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the paper's own dataset; the named repositories hold the original data used.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The data that support the findings of this study are available from the NIMH Data Archive (ABCD dataset), Child Mind Institute (HBN dataset) and the authors of the BHRC dataset. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available: ABCD dataset ‐ https://nda.nih.gov/abcd/ ; HBN dataset ‐ https://data.healthybrainnetwork.org/main.php ; BHRC dataset ‐ from the authors https://osf.io/ktz5h/wiki/home/ with the permission of the authors.”
The statement points to third-party repositories for the original data used, not to the study's own validation results. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not provide an itemized inventory of its own dataset; the results are presented in tables. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper's own data are the results in the article, but the paper does not state that they are openly accessible; the open access statement is about the article, not the data. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
No access level label is applied to the paper's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper's own data are aggregate results and not sensitive, so no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states how long the paper's own data will remain available or when they become obtainable.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format token is named for the paper's own data; the results are presented in the article.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard from FAIRsharing is named for the paper's own validation results.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“The ABCD data used in this report came from 10.15154/z563‐zd24 (release 5.1).”
The paper cites a DOI for the ABCD dataset, an identifier for a resource other than its own data.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is stated for the paper's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the paper's own data; the original data have a version (release 5.1) but that is not the study's own data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“All code for our analyses and figures is available online at https://github.com/transatlantic‐comppsych/CBCL_Aff_Validation .”
The paper gives a machine-resolvable GitHub URL for the study's own code. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health National Institutes of Health (NIH) (ZIAMH002957 (to AS), ZIAMH002781 (to DP) and ZICMH002968 (to Francisco Pereira)).”
The paper provides specific award numbers (ZIAMH002957, ZIAMH002781, ZICMH002968) for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name the specific tools or instruments used to produce its own data (the analysis code is on GitHub but no tool names). [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No README, data dictionary, or codebook is named as accompanying the data; the tables are inside the article. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041025-07
11/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at UWM
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051039-04
19/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT UVM
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1ZIAMH002781-23
fMRI Studies of Pediatric Mood and Anxiety Disorders
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041022-03
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041048-11
8/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT CHLA
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DA041117-04S1
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) Consortium
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1ZIAMH002957-06
Mood, Brain, and Development Unit
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1ZICMH002968-03
Machine Learning Team
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA050989-05
15/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at LIBR
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041156-05
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD): FIU
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01DA050987-01
17/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT UCLA
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041028-08
12/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT U PITTSBURGH
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041089-05
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051018-06
14/21 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project Site at CU Boulder
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051038-02
21/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT WUSTL
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA050988-06
16/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041120-03
ABCD-USA Consortium: Twin Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01DA041093-01
13/13 ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U24DA041123-06
ABCD-USA Consortium: Data Analysis, Informatics and Resource Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA041106-11
9/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT U MICHIGAN
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051016-03
18/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DA041134-04S1
Prospective Research Studies of Maturation (PRISM)- Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U01DA041148-04S1
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1U01DA041174-01
ABCD-USA: NYC Research Project
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051037-04
20/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT VCU
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U24DA041147-06S5
ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating Center
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals