Imputation of low‐density marker chip data in plant breeding: Evaluation of methods based on sugar beet is a research paper published in The Plant Genome (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.870. It has been cited 16 times, with 16 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
Abstract Low‐density genotyping followed by imputation reduces genotyping costs while still providing high‐density marker information. An increased marker density has the potential to improve the outcome of all applications that are based on genomic data. This study investigates techniques for 1k to 20k genomic marker imputation for plant breeding programs with sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris ) as an example crop, where these are realistic marker numbers for modern breeding applications. The generally accepted ‘gold standard’ for imputation, Beagle 5.1, was compared with the recently developed software AlphaPlantImpute2 which is designed specifically for plant breeding. For Beagle 5.1 and AlphaPlantImpute2, the imputation strategy as well as the imputation parameters were optimized in this study. We found that the imputation accuracy of Beagle could be tremendously improved (0.22 to 0.67) by tuning parameters, mainly by lowering the values for the parameter for the effective population size and increasing the number of iterations performed. Separating the phasing and imputation steps also improved accuracies when optimized parameters were used (0.67 to 0.82). We also found that the imputation accuracy of Beagle decreased when more low‐density lines were included for imputation. AlphaPlantImpute2 produced very high accuracies without optimization (0.89) and was generally less responsive to optimization. Overall, AlphaPlantImpute2 performed relatively better for imputation whereas Beagle was better for phasing. Combining both tools yielded the highest accuracies.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
0.425
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.445
From 10 citing papers with measurable signal
DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 49% comes from its base citations and 51% from the citation network (10 citing papers contributed measurable signal).
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.
Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.