IMPC impact on preclinical mouse models is a dataset published in Mammalian Genome (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.241, placing it in the top 61.3% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 2/100.
Ranks in the top 61% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated, so no persistent identifier is provided.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No repository is named as holder because no datasets were generated.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated or cited, so no identifier appears in any location.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
The statement declares no datasets were generated or analysed, offering no route to any data.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated, so no itemised inventory or prose description of the dataset exists.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were produced, so no access route is given.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were produced, so no access-level label is stated.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No sensitive data were generated, so no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were produced, so no temporal commitment is stated.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were generated, so no file format is named.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were generated, so no community standard is applied to the data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for a non-own resource is provided in the text; only grant numbers and general references appear.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated, so no reuse licence is attached to the data; the article's CC BY 4.0 licence does not apply to data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated, so no version token or date is provided.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code is mentioned; the paper does not address code availability.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported in part by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung [BMBF]) and the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts (Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst) within the initial phase of the German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), grant: 01EE2303E, and by NIH grants (UM1OD023221) to the Davis-Toronto-Collaborative- Consortium (DTCC) and UM1HG006370 to the Mouse Phenotying Informatics (MPI2) consortium.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides specific grant numbers for the funding that supported the work. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No data were produced, so no instruments, kits, or software for data generation are named.
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.”
No dataset was generated, so no documentation object or variable-definition table is provided.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →NIH HHS
Grant: U42 OD011175
NHGRI NIH HHS
Grant: U54 HG006370
NIH HHS
Grant: UM1 OD023221
NIH HHS
Grant: U42 OD012210
Wellcome Trust
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3UM1OD023221-14S1
KOMP2-Phase3 Production and Phenotyping by the DTCC Consortium TCP Transfer to UC Davis
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UM1HG006370-10
Mouse Phenotyping Informatics Infrastructure - MP12
Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
Keywords