Associations Between Traumatic Stress, Brain Volumes and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Children: Data from the ABCD Study is a dataset published in Behavior Genetics (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.418, placing it in the top 44.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 8 times, with 8 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 8/100.
Ranks in the top 44% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“No persistent identifier is given for the paper's own dataset.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not assign any identifier to its own data; the only data link is to the NDA for the ABCD Study, which is not the paper's own dataset.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“No repository is named for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name any repository holding its own data; the NDA is for the ABCD Study, not the paper's derived data.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“No identifier for the paper's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not cite any dataset it generated; the only reference to data is the ABCD Study, which is the source, not the output.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The paper states: 'Due to privacy policies and protection of participants, ABCD Study® data will not be available here. To request access follow: https://nda.nih.gov.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data-availability statement refers to the original ABCD Study data, not the paper's own dataset, and declares the data are not available here; thus it does not point to a repository record for the paper's own data.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“No itemised inventory of the paper's own dataset exists.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not provide a section, table, or list describing the files, variables, or size of its own generated dataset; it only describes the methods and results.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The paper states: 'Due to privacy policies and protection of participants, ABCD Study® data will not be available here. To request access follow: https://nda.nih.gov.'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper's own data are not made accessible; the statement indicates that the data used (ABCD Study) are not available here, and no route is given for the paper's own derived data.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“There is no explicit access-level label for the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not label the access level of its own data; it merely states that the ABCD Study data are not available here and directs to the NDA, which is the original source, not the paper's own dataset.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“No gatekeeper is named for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name any gatekeeper for its own data; it only refers to the original ABCD Study data access through NDA, which is not the paper's own dataset.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“No statement about retention of the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper makes no commitment about how long its own data will be available; the data are not shared.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
“No file format is named for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not specify the format of any data files it generated; only the code is mentioned.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“No community standard for data or metadata is named for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper uses standard psychiatric assessments (DSM-5, KSADS-5) but these are not data/metadata standards applied to the paper's own dataset.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Code availability: 'https://github.com/dbustamantep/mlSEMhybridEN.git'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a URL for the code used in the analysis, which is a resource other than the paper's own dataset and is referenced by an identifier. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
“No licence is stated for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper is under CC BY 4.0, but that applies to the article, not the data; no reuse licence is given for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
“No version token or date is given for the paper's own data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not provide a version or date to identify the snapshot of its own data; only the code has a version (GitHub).
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Code availability https://github.com/dbustamantep/mlSEMhybridEN.git”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper gives a machine-resolvable URL to the code repository, which is a locator for the study's own code. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Work for this project was supported by the Integrative Life Sciences Doctoral Program and the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics T32 Training Grant MH020030-21A1 from the National Institute of Mental Health (DB), K02 AA023239 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and from VCU’s Presidential Research Quest Fund (AA), the National Institute on Drug Abuse R01 DA049867-01A1 (JP and MN; PI: MN), and U01 DA051037-01 (MN) Grants.”
The paper provides specific grant numbers for the funding that supported the work.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“OpenMx (a free and open source program for extended SEM; Neale et al. 2016; use version 2.19.6-31 for regularization functions)”
The paper names specific software versions used to produce the data, which qualifies as provenance information for the data generation. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“No documentation object is named as accompanying the data.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not mention a README, data dictionary, or codebook for its own dataset; the variable definitions are within the article text.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.330
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0881
From 5 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 8 citers.
National Institute of Mental Health
Grant: MH020030-21A1
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Grant: K02 AA023239
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: U01 DA051037-01
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: R01 DA049867-01A1
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Grant: R01 DA049867-01A1 (PI:Neale)
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DA049867
NIDA NIH HHS
Grant: U01 DA051037
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: T32 MH020030
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5K02AA023239-04
Stress-induced drinking in Returning Soldiers: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01DA051037-04
20/21 ABCD-USA CONSORTIUM: RESEARCH PROJECT SITE AT VCU
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3R01DA049867-03S1
Accelerating Development of OpenMx for Interoperability and Cloud Use
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals