Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study

Maternal and Child Health Journal(2021)10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4Source: DataRank Database

Feasibility of Conducting a Trial Assessing Benefits and Risks of Planned Caesarean Section Versus Planned Vaginal Birth: A Cross-Sectional Study is a research paper published in Maternal and Child Health Journal (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.165. It has been cited 2 times.

N/A

0.165DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access2 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (6 grants)OA: greenTopics (60)IDs (PubMed, PMC)SDGs (3)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

Base Score Contribution

0.165

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

Citation network not refreshed for this result

This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Authors (14)

Melissa Amyx ORCID,Fernando Althabe ORCID,Julie Rivo,Verónica Pingray ORCID,Nicole Minckas ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:33392930 PMC:PMC7922524

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5T32HD057780

Fogarty International Center

Grant: R25TW009340

Maternal and Child Health Bureau

Grant: T03MC07649

NICHD NIH HHS

Grant: T32 HD057780

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 3R25TW009340-01S4

Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating Center

National Institutes of Health

Grant: 5T32HD057780-04

Training in Global Reproductive Epidemiology (TIGRE)

greenLicense: Springer TDM

repositoryhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7922524

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4.pdf

publisherhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4/fulltext.html

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-03073-4

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7922524

Fields of Study

03 medical and health sciences0302 clinical medicineAdolescentAdultArgentinaCesarean SectionCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricElective Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePregnancyRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

MeSH Terms

HumansDelivery, ObstetricCesarean SectionRisk AssessmentCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesPregnancyAdolescentAdultMiddle AgedHealth PersonnelArgentinaFemaleYoung AdultPatient PreferenceElective Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialVaginal DeliveryElective Cesarean DeliveryPartially Randomized Patient Preference TrialPreference Controlled TrialAdultAdolescentHealth PersonnelArgentinaRisk AssessmentCohort StudiesYoung Adulthttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3PregnancyHumanshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Cesarean SectionPatient PreferenceMiddle AgedDelivery, ObstetricCross-Sectional StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresFeasibility StudiesFemale

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 3: 3. Good healthSDG 5: 5. Gender equalitySDG 16: 16. Peace & justice