Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns Among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders: The COMPASS Survey is a dataset published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.2, placing it in the top 16.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 23 times, with 14 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 17% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper provides no persistent identifier for its own dataset, so class 3 (no).
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No repository is named; the data are held by the corresponding author, so class 3 (no).
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, so class 3 (no).
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data availability statement points to the corresponding author (Colavizza category 1), which is class 2 (partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Data from the COVID-19 Effects on the Mental and Physical Health of AAPI Survey Study (COMPASS), a cross-sectional, national survey for AAPI adults in the U.S. were used (N=1,646).”
The dataset content is described in running prose only, not in an itemised inventory, so class 2 (partial). [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only access route is a discretionary request to a person, which is not a followable route and is class 3 (no).
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
No access-level label is applied to the data, but the text describes an access action (request from the corresponding author), which is class 2 (partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The data are human-subject data, and the gatekeeper is the corresponding author, a natural person, which is class 2 (partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data become available or how long they persist; therefore class 3 (no).
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data, so class 3 (no).
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named, so class 3 (no).
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for any external resource (other than reference-list entries) is given, so class 3 (no).
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is named for the data; the CC BY 4.0 license applies to the article, not the data, so class 3 (no).
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date pins the snapshot of the dataset, so class 3 (no). [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“The SAS code used to produce these analyses is available upon request from the corresponding author.”
The code is offered only on request, not via a machine-resolvable locator, so class 3 (no).
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“3R24AG063718-02S1”
The paper provides an award number attached to a named funder (NIH/NIA), which is class 1 (yes).
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The survey used Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tools hosted at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) [17, 18].”
The paper names specific tools (REDCap, SAS Software) used in data collection and analysis. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“COVID-19 Vaccine Concerns were assessed with the following question: 'Some people may have concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, do you have any of the concerns below (please check all that apply)?'”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are provided inside the article (in the Methods section), not in a separate documentation object shipped with the data, so class 2 (partial). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.477
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.755
From 12 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 14 citers.
National Institute on Aging
Grant: 3R24AG063718-02S1
COVID-19 Effects on the Mental and Physical Health of AAPI Survey Study (COMPASS)
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P01 AG012435
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R01 AG083926
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R24 AG063718
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R56 AG069130
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals