Changes in olive oil consumption and long-term body weight changes in 3 United States prospective cohort studies is a dataset published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.275, placing it in the top 57.4% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 57% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent-identifier string or data URL is given for the dataset; the article DOI is not the data's identifier. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“data cannot be shared publicly, and requests to access Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS)/Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) data must be submitted in writing.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The named holder is the Nurses’ Health Studies/HPFS, which are not a standard repository listed in re3data/FAIRsharing; they are a non-repository host. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for this study's dataset appears anywhere in the paper. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Because of participant confidentiality and privacy concerns, data cannot be shared publicly, and requests to access Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS)/Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) data must be submitted in writing.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a request process (Colavizza category 1: data available on request). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“We examined data from 121,119 females and males from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1990–2010), NHSII (1991–2015), and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS, 1990–2014), aged 65 y or younger and who were free from chronic disease at baseline.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset's extent is described in running prose, not in an itemised inventory. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Because of participant confidentiality and privacy concerns, data cannot be shared publicly, and requests to access Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS)/Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) data must be submitted in writing.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The text states a precondition (written request) and does not offer unconditional access. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Because of participant confidentiality and privacy concerns, data cannot be shared publicly, and requests to access Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS)/Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) data must be submitted in writing.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes the action to obtain data (written request) but does not label the access level (e.g., 'restricted'). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“Further information including the procedures to obtain and access data from the NHS and HPFS, is provided at https://nurseshealthstudy.org/researchers (contact e-mail: [email protected])”
The gatekeeper is a personal contact email, not an institutional committee. [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No sentence states when the data are available or how long they persist.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard is named.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
No identifier for an external resource (e.g., source dataset, reference genome) is given beyond citations. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The CC BY-NC-ND license applies to the article, not the data; no license is named for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date pins the snapshot of the data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code locator is given; code is not mentioned.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by research grants UM1 CA186107, U01 CA176726, U01 CA167552, P01 CA87969, P01 CA055075, R01 HL034594, HL088521, HL35464, HL60712, DK120870, K01 HL169414 from the National Institute of Health, United States.”
Specific grant numbers from the NIH are provided. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes the current analysis methods but does not name the instruments or software used to produce the original cohort data. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
Neither a documentation object shipped with the data nor a variable-definition table inside the article is present. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0331
From 3 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Grant: NNF18CC0034900
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL088521
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK120870
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 CA167552
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: K01 HL169414
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: UM1 CA186107
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: P01 CA055075
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL034594
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL035464
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL060712
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 CA176726
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P01CA055075-10S1
PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF DIET AND CANCER IN MEN (HEALTH PROFESSIONALS FOLLOWUP)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HL034594-27
Risk Factors for CVD in Women
Novo Nordisk Foundation
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3P01CA087969-03S1
DIET, HORMONES AND RISK OF COLORECTAL CANCERS
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HL088521-11
Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Women
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5K01HL169414-02
A Culturally-Adapted Multicomponent Teaching Kitchen Intervention for Low-Income Latino Adults
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U01CA167552-06
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health Professionals
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01CA176726-09
Life Course Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Women
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5UM1CA186107-05
Long Term Multidisciplinary Study of Cancer in Women: The Nurses Health Study
Københavns Universitet
Harvard University
US Government National Institutes of Health
FWCI
4.22
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals