Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of obesity with disability between age 50 and 90 in the SHARE study is a dataset published in Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.511, placing it in the top 37.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 6 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 38% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not provide a persistent identifier for its own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The paper does not name a repository for its own data; it only names the SHARE repository for the source data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
The paper does not cite its own dataset; it only cites the SHARE data descriptor paper. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper's data availability statement refers to the SHARE source data, not to the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not describe its own dataset in an itemised inventory; it describes the SHARE source data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper does not provide a route to its own data; it only points to the SHARE data, which is third-party. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not state an access level for its own data; it only mentions the availability of the SHARE source data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper provides a public URL with no gatekeeper named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not address the persistence or availability timing of its own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not specify any file format for the data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name a community standard for its own data; it uses standard analysis definitions but not as a data standard. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Data available on http://www.share-project.org/home0.html”
The paper provides an identifier (URL) for the external SHARE data resource. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper does not state any license for the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not provide a version token or date for its own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“All analyses were undertaken using STATA, version 17.”
The paper does not provide a locator for the analysis code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging, NIH (R01AG056477, RF1AG062553 to ASM) and the French National Research Agency (ANR-19-CE36-0004-01 to SS).”
The paper gives award numbers.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analyses were undertaken using STATA, version 17.”
The paper names the software STATA version 17, which was used to produce the analytical results (the study's own data). [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“IADLs were ascertained based on the Lawton-Brody scale with the following 6 items: using a map, preparing a meal, shopping, using a telephone, taking medications, and managing money. ADLs were ascertained based on the Katz scale and included the following 6 items: dressing, walking across a room, bathing, transferring, eating, and toileting.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
Variable definitions are given in the article text, not in a shipped codebook. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.292
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.219
From 6 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 6 citers.
Sixth Framework Programme
Grant: CIT4-CT-2006-028812
Sixth Framework Programme
Grant: CIT5-CT-2005-028857
Sixth Framework Programme
Grant: RII-CT-2006-062193
Fifth Framework Programme
Grant: QLK6-CT-2001-00360
National Institute on Aging
Grant: HHSN271201300071C
National Institute on Aging
Grant: IAG_BSR06-11
National Institute on Aging
Grant: OGHA_04-064
National Institute on Aging
Grant: P01_AG005842
National Institute on Aging
Grant: P01_AG08291
National Institute on Aging
Grant: P30_AG12815
National Institute on Aging
Grant: R21_AG025169
National Institute on Aging
Grant: U01_AG09740-13S2
National Institute on Aging
Grant: Y1-AG-4553-01
Seventh Framework Programme
Grant: 211909
Seventh Framework Programme
Grant: 227822
Seventh Framework Programme
Grant: 261982
Seventh Framework Programme
Grant: 283646
Horizon 2020
Grant: 654221
Synergies for Europe's Research Infrastructures in the Social Sciences
Horizon 2020
Grant: 676536
Achieving world-class standards in all SHARE countries
Horizon 2020
Grant: 823782
Social Sciences & Humanities Open Cloud
Horizon 2020
Grant: 870628
Cohesion in further developing and innovating SHARE across all 28 member countries
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01AG056477
National Institutes of Health
Grant: RF1AG062553
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Grant: ANR-19-CE36-0004-01
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P01 AG005842
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R21 AG025169
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: R03 AG045301
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P01 AG008291
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: U01 AG009740
NIA NIH HHS
Grant: P30 AG012815
European Commission
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
FWCI
0.98
Citation Percentile
0.8%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords