Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Evidence from a Bayesian reanalysis of the iPROVE-OLV study: is it time to update our prior assumptions regarding neuromuscular block and reversal?

British Journal of Anaesthesia(2025)10.1016/j.bja.2025.04.003Source: DataRank Database

Evidence from a Bayesian reanalysis of the iPROVE-OLV study: is it time to update our prior assumptions regarding neuromuscular block and reversal? is a research paper published in British Journal of Anaesthesia (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 1 time.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

1 citations

Download PDF

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (2 grants)Topics (12)IDs (PubMed, PMC)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (2)

Manfred Blobner ORCID,Douglas A. Colquhoun ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:40526734 PMC:PMC12597356

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Grant: K08HL159327

National Institutes of Health

MeSH Terms

HumansNeuromuscular BlockadeBayes TheoremRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicNeuromuscular Monitoring

Keywords

ReversalNeostigmineBayesian analysisPractice GuidelinesSugammadexNeuromuscular Block