Clinical and advanced neurophysiology in the prognostic and diagnostic evaluation of disorders of consciousness: review of an IFCN-endorsed expert group is a research paper published in Clinical Neurophysiology (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 205 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R01 NS106014
NINDS NIH HHS
Grant: R03 NS112760
Eurostars
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Horizon 2020
James S. McDonnell Foundation
FWCI
13.99
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals
Additional file 1 of Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 1 of Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 2 of Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 2 of Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study
Additional file 1 of SSEP N20 and P25 amplitudes predict poor and good neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest
Additional file 1 of SSEP N20 and P25 amplitudes predict poor and good neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest
Additional file 1 of The importance of instrumental assessment in disorders of consciousness: a comparison between American, European, and UK International recommendations
Additional file 1 of The importance of instrumental assessment in disorders of consciousness: a comparison between American, European, and UK International recommendations