A multi-omics systems vaccinology resource to develop and test computational models of immunity is a dataset published in Cell Reports Methods (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.280, placing it in the top 56.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 5 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 38/100.
Ranks in the top 57% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a DOI (10.5281/zenodo.10789473) for the dataset. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The named repository is Zenodo, a curated archive. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset identifier appears in the body text, not in the reference list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The statement points to a repository record with a DOI, fulfilling the 'yes' category. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“The total feature count for the training dataset was 58,659, whereas the feature count for the test dataset was 58,462 (Figure 2A).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The dataset content is described in a running prose sentence, not in a structured table or enumerated list. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides a direct link to the data in Zenodo with no stated precondition. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The training and test datasets used for the first challenge can be accessible through a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10789473.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper describes an action to access the data (Zenodo link) but does not label the access level explicitly. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
“The paper does not name any gatekeeper. The data are openly deposited in Zenodo with no mention of controlled access, despite involving human subjects. The only access-related statement is that the data are accessible via Zenodo. No institutional or personal gatekeeper is named.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper does not name any gatekeeper; the data are openly accessible without restrictions. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not mention any retention period or timing for data availability.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named for the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No community standard (e.g., MIAME, ontologies) is named for the data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“The remaining reads were aligned to the GRCh38 reference genome and Gencode v27 annotations using STAR (v2.6.1).”
The paper gives identifiers for the reference genome (GRCh38) and annotations (Gencode v27) used. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No license is stated for the data; the CC BY license applies to the article only.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is provided for the dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“all source code for the imputation, models, and assessment metrics is publicly available as part of our CMI-PB GitHub repository ( https://github.com/CMI-PB).”
The paper provides a machine-resolvable locator (GitHub URL) for the study's own code. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of NIH under award nos. U01AI150753, U01AI141995, and U19AI142742.”
The paper includes award numbers from the funder. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“The remaining reads were aligned to the GRCh38 reference genome and Gencode v27 annotations using STAR (v2.6.1).”
The paper names specific software versions used in data production. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
“The first challenge comprised 14 prediction tasks that we describe in Table S1”
Variable definitions are provided in a supplementary table inside the article, not as a separate file travelling with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.269
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0116
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
NIAID
Grant: U01AI150753
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U01AI141995
National Institutes of Health
Grant: U19AI142742
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: R35 GM128938
FWCI
0.81
Citation Percentile
0.7%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals