Quality wines in Italy and France: A dataset of protected designation of origin specifications

“Repository name: figshare Data identification number: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25393261.v2 Direct URL to data: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_wines_in_Italy_and_France_a_dataset_of_protected_designation_of_origin_specifications/25393261”

The data-availability statement points to a repository record with a PID and direct link, matching Colavizza category 3.

Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes

“Our dataset comprises a set of regulatory information for all the PDO wines produced in Italy and France as of 04.11.2021, usable by researchers and decision makers (see Fig. 1). We collected only information that was standardizable among the two countries and the PDO wines. The information collected covers several specifications related to wine products protected by the PDO quality scheme. This includes the name of the wine product as well as information about the PDO where it is produced (e.g., name and registration date), the colour of the wine and the category of the wine product. The dataset also includes information on several agronomic practices that must be used when producing the wine, such as the main varieties that make up a wine and the additional varieties that may be added to the product in lower percentages. The varieties are spelled using the OIV nomenclature, the letter at the end of the variety commonly specifies the grape colour (e.g., N = noir, B = blanc, G = gris). Additionally, the collected data also specifies the minimum usable planting density and maximum yield from the vineyards for each wine product.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded

The dataset content is described in running prose rather than an itemised inventory (section, table, or list). [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]

RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'

“The data is freely available through the Figshare data publisher”

The paper explicitly states that the data is freely available, which is a natural-language label for open access.

FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl

“the current work did not involve human subjects, animal experiments, or any data collected from social media platforms.”

The data are not sensitive or human-subject, and no gatekeeper is named; the paper explicitly states no human subjects were involved.

NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse

“The data is freely available through the Figshare data publisher”

The paper states the data is available now but does not specify how long it will persist, so only availability timing is given. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]

NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'

“The varieties are spelled using the OIV nomenclature”

The paper names the OIV nomenclature, a community standard for vine varieties, applied to the data.

RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'

“10.1038/s41597-022-01513-0”

The paper references another dataset with a DOI (reference [1]), providing an identifier for a resource other than its own dataset.

RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'

“Next, we collected the relevant entries by copy-pasting them in a dedicated spreadsheet table before proceeding with their standardization using the Excel software.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded

The paper names Excel software as a specific tool used to produce the data. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'partial' (2/5 passes agreed)]

RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance

“Fig. 1 (a) PDO wine information included in our database (b) names of the fields included in our database and methodology for standardization.”

The variable-level definitions are provided inside the article (Figure 1 caption and text), but no separate documentation object is shipped with the data. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]

RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t