A comparison of family health history of breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and diabetes in self-reported survey and electronic health records data, All of Us Research Program is a dataset published in Genetics in Medicine Open (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 77.8% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 1 time, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 0/100.
Ranks in the top 78% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
No persistent identifier string for the study's own data is present; the article DOI is not a data PID.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the study's own data; the All of Us Research Hub is the source of the data used. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the study's own dataset appears in the reference list or body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The only data-availability statement describes the All of Us source data, not the study's own data, and therefore does not count. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
No itemised inventory of the study's own dataset exists; the tables describe analytical results, not the dataset itself. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
No route to the study's own data is given; the only availability statement points to the All of Us source data with a precondition. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not label the access level of the study's own data; the only access statement refers to the All of Us source data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The study uses human subject data but names no gatekeeper for its own data; the All of Us registration requirement is for the source data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
No temporal commitment is made about the study's own data; the text only describes the source data's timeline.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format for the study's own data is named anywhere in the text.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The only community standard mentioned (OMOP) applies to the source data, not to the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for any resource the study's data depend on (source data given only as a URL). [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The CC BY-NC-ND license applies to the article, not to the study's own data; no data license is named. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date pins the study's own data; only the source data version is mentioned. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
No code availability statement is provided; the study's own code is not mentioned.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“Funding None.”
The paper explicitly states no funding for the study, so no funder or award number is attributed to the work. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper describes generic analysis methods without naming specific instruments, kits, or software versions for producing the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No documentation object (README, codebook) is named as accompanying the study's own data; variable definitions are absent. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →National Institutes of Health
Grant: U24 OD023176
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 OT2 OD025277
National Institutes of Health
Grant: HHSN 263201600085U
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 U24 OD023163
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 OT2 OD025276
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 OT2 OD026555
National Institutes of Health
Grant: AOD 16037
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1 U24 OD023121
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3 OT2 OD023206
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3 OT2 OD023205
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U24OD023176-04
Technology to Empower Changes in Health (TECH) Network Participant Technologies Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026550-01S3
Trans-America Consortium of the Health Care Systems Research Network for the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026554-01S2
All of Us Pennsylvania
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026557-01S5
Illinois Precision Medicine Consortium
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026556-01S2
New York City Consortium for Precision Medicine
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025276-02S7
PRIDEnet for the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD023205-01S1
Communications Design and Development for NIH Precision Medicine Initiative Research Projects
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD026549-01
University of Arizona-Banner Health All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026555-01S5
All of Us Wisconsin
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD026553-01
The New England Precision Medicine Consortium of the All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U24OD023163-02
Adaptive Platform for Personalized Engagement
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026548-01S1
Southern All of Us Network
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3U24OD023121-02S1
Precision Medicine Initiative Cohort Program Biobank
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U2COD023196-04
Data and Research Support Center
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025277-02S1
Healthy Americas: All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD025337-01S3
Research Matters: Creating Possibilities to Achieve Health and Wellness for All of Us Research Program
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD023206-01S2
Communication Implementation and Coordination for NIH Precision Medicine Initiative Research Projects
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 1OT2OD025315-01
Empowerment-focused Outreach, Education and Enrollment of Tennessee Older Adults in the All of Us Research Program through Community Efforts by FiftyForward
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 3OT2OD026551-01S1
SouthEast Enrollment Center (SEEC)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FWCI
0.48
Citation Percentile
0.6%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals