Are written advance directives helpful to guide end-of-life therapy in the intensive care unit? A retrospective matched-cohort study is a research paper published in Journal of Critical Care (2014). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.665. It has been cited 83 times.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.665
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Grant: 01EO1002
FWCI
7.02
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Additional file 1 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Additional file 1 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Additional file 2 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Additional file 2 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Additional file 3 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment
Additional file 3 of Impact of advance directives on the variability between intensivists in the decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment