🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge

Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Segmentation of cellular patterns in confocal images of melanocytic lesions in vivo via a multiscale encoder-decoder network (MED-Net)

IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia)(2020)10.1016/j.media.2020.101841Source: DataRank Database

Segmentation of cellular patterns in confocal images of melanocytic lesions in vivo via a multiscale encoder-decoder network (MED-Net) is a research paper published in IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.570. It has been cited 36 times, with 1 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

0.570DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access36 citations · 1 citing works in its network

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (5 grants)OA: greenTopics (9)IDs (PubMed, PMC)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 95%Citation Network 5%

Base Score Contribution

0.542

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.0283

From 1 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 1 citer driving the network score

Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(C_q) divided by its reference count — out of 1 citer.

A Clinical Perspective on the Automated Analysis of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Dermatology
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine202116 citations85 referencesContributes 0.033

Authors (9)

Alican Bozkurt ORCID,Christi Alessi‐Fox ORCID,Melissa Gill ORCID,Caterina Longo ORCID,Giovanni Pellacani ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:33142135 PMC:PMC7885250

National Cancer Institute

Grant: R01CA199673

National Cancer Institute

Grant: P30CA008748

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute

Nvidia

greenLicense: cc-by-nc-nd

repositoryhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.01005

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S136184152030205X?httpAccept=text/xml

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S136184152030205X?httpAccept=text/plain

repositoryhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7885250

repositoryhttp://export.arxiv.org/pdf/2001.01005

MeSH Terms

HumansMicroscopy, ConfocalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Keywords

DermatologyReflectance Confocal MicroscopyMelanocytic LesionSemantic SegmentationIn Vivo Segmentation