Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Contemporary decision-making factors leading to cervical disc replacement versus fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy: survey opinions from members of the society of minimally invasive spine surgeon and cervical spine research society

The Spine Journal(2025)10.1016/j.spinee.2025.08.334Source: DataRank Database

Contemporary decision-making factors leading to cervical disc replacement versus fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy: survey opinions from members of the society of minimally invasive spine surgeon and cervical spine research society is a research paper published in The Spine Journal (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 1 time.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

1 citations

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (2 grants)Impact (FWCI 2.14)OA: closedTopics (47)IDs (PubMed, OpenAlex)SDGs (1)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (9)

Adrian Lui,Christopher Mikhail ORCID,Kyle W. Morse ORCID,Joshua Zhang ORCID,Cole Kwas ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:40882848 OpenAlex:https://openalex.org/W4413758055

National Institutes of Health

Grant: UL1 TR002384

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

FWCI

2.14

Citation Percentile

0.9%

Citation Trend

2026

closedLicense: https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1529943025007375?httpAccept=text/xml

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1529943025007375?httpAccept=text/plain

journalhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.08.334

repositoryhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40882848

Fields of Study

Cervical and Thoracic MyelopathySpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentHumansSpinal FusionRadiculopathyTotal Disc ReplacementCervical VertebraeSpinal Cord DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMaleFemaleSocieties, MedicalIntervertebral Disc DegenerationClinical Decision-MakingDiskectomySurgeons

MeSH Terms

Clinical Decision-MakingCervical VertebraeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesRadiculopathySocieties, MedicalSpinal Cord DiseasesSpinal FusionDiskectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresIntervertebral Disc DegenerationTotal Disc ReplacementSurgeons

Keywords

MedicineMyelopathyCervical radiculopathySurgeryPhysical therapyCervical spineSpinal cordFusionArthroplastyAnterior Cervical Discectomy FusionCervical Disc ReplacementDegenerative Cervical Radiculopathy

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG 0: Peace, Justice and strong institutions

Contemporary decision-making factors leading to cervical disc replacement versus fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy: survey opinions from members of the society of minimally invasive spine surgeon and cervical spine research society

FAIR Checklist

Authors (9)

Funding (2 grants)

Impact

Open Access

Topics