Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Reply to Editorial Comment on “National Assessment of Urology Interest Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing Current Practices and Challenges”

Urology(2025)10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.003Source: DataRank Database

Reply to Editorial Comment on “National Assessment of Urology Interest Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing Current Practices and Challenges” is a research paper published in Urology (2025). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

0 citations

Free full text

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Funding (1 grants)OA: closedIDs (PubMed)

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (5)

Joanna Orzel,Jace Leininger,Ryan L. Steinberg ORCID,Chad R. Tracy ORCID,Lola Lozano ORCID

Live enrichment

PubMed:40940000

National Institutes of Health

closedLicense: https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-004

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S009042952500843X?httpAccept=text/xml

publisherhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S009042952500843X?httpAccept=text/plain

Reply to Editorial Comment on “National Assessment of Urology Interest Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing Current Practices and Challenges”

FAIR Checklist

Authors (5)

Funding (1 grants)

Open Access