Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Evaluation of initial progress to implement Common Metrics across the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science(2020)10.1017/cts.2020.517Source: DataRank Database

Evaluation of initial progress to implement Common Metrics across the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium is a research paper published in Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 12 times.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access12 citations

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (11)

Andrada Tomoaia‐Cotisel ORCID,Farzad Noubary ORCID,Hong Chang ORCID,Peter Mendel ORCID,Anshu Parajulee ORCID