Pilot corpus: NIH-funded biomedical datasets. Any DOI can be scored on demand — network effects sharpen as coverage grows.

Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science(2020)10.1017/cts.2020.542Source: DataRank Database

Using the payback framework to evaluate the outcomes of pilot projects supported by the Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance is a research paper published in Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (2020). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0. It has been cited 14 times.

N/A

0DataRank · unranked

Scored on demand from live citation data

Open Access14 citations

Cite:

DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?

›Methodology & internals

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (1/2)

Open Access

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.

Authors (6)

Nicole Llewellyn ORCID,Manzi Ngaiza,Eric J. Nehl ORCID,Dorothy R. Carter ORCID,Jeff M. Sands ORCID