🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Systematic Evaluation of Drug–Disease Relationships to Identify Leads for Novel Drug Uses

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics(2009)10.1038/clpt.2009.103Source: DataRank Database

Systematic Evaluation of Drug–Disease Relationships to Identify Leads for Novel Drug Uses is a research paper published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2009). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.842. It has been cited 273 times.

N/A
0.842DataRank · unranked
0.842
Open Access273 citations · base score 5.6
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Drug repositioning refers to the discovery of alternative uses for drugs--uses that are different from that for which the drugs were originally intended. One challenge in this effort lies in choosing the indication for which a drug of interest could be prospectively tested. We systematically evaluated a drug treatment-based view of diseases in order to address this challenge. Suggestions for novel drug uses were generated using a "guilt by association" approach. When compared with a control group of drug uses, the suggested novel drug uses generated by this approach were significantly enriched with respect to previous and ongoing clinical trials.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

      Base Score Contribution

      0.842

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0

      Citation network not refreshed for this result

      This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Authors (3)

      Annie ChiangORCID,Atul Janardhan ButteORCID,Annie P Chiang

      Related Papers (10)

      Nucleic Acids Research(2010)
      co-cited
      10.1093/nar/gkq1037
      Molecular Systems Biology(2009)
      co-cited
      10.1038/msb.2009.66
      Nucleic Acids Research(2009)
      co-cited
      10.1093/nar/gkn892
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(2005)
      co-cited
      10.1073/pnas.0506580102