Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 long term outcomes study (PECOS): cross sectional analysis at baseline is a dataset published in Pediatric Research (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.374, placing it in the top 48% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 7 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 4/100.
Ranks in the top 48% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“The datasets generated during and or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due as the study is currently in progress and the datasets are continuously updated. Individual patient/participant data will not be provided at the time of publication.”
The paper does not provide any persistent identifier for its own dataset; the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is a trial registration, not a dataset PID.
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
No repository is named as the holder of the data; the data are stated to be not publicly available and will not be provided.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
No identifier for the dataset appears anywhere in the paper, neither in the reference list nor in the body text.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The data availability statement declares the data are not publicly available and will not be provided, offering no route of any kind, which corresponds to Colavizza category 0.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper describes the dataset content (demographics, symptoms, etc.) only in running prose within the methods section; there is no itemised inventory, table, or section heading that lists files or variables. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The data availability statement explicitly states the data are not publicly available and will not be provided, so no access route is given.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“The datasets generated during and or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due as the study is currently in progress and the datasets are continuously updated. Individual patient/participant data will not be provided at the time of publication.”
The paper states the data are not publicly available but does not apply an explicit access-level label from the standard vocabulary. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are not accessible and no gatekeeper is named; the paper only mentions IRB approval for the study itself.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state any retention period, availability timing, or persistence commitment; it only says the data are continuously updated and not provided.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format of any kind is named for the released data, as the data are not released.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
“Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding was used for standardization and organ system grouping.”
MedDRA is a community standard vocabulary applied to the data (grouping new diagnoses), and PROMIS is also a standard measurement system.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04830852”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The only identifier for an external resource is the trial registration number, which is not a dataset or code resource; no other identifiers (e.g., for source datasets, reference genomes, or code) are given.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The only licence mentioned is the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for the article, not for the data; no licence is attached to the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper uses a date cut-off (June 30, 2023) for baseline visits, which pins the snapshot of the data; no version token is given. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“All analyses were performed using R software, version 4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) or Stata, version 18.0 for windows.”
The paper names the software used but does not provide any locator (URL, DOI, or repository) for the study's own code; no code availability statement is given.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“This research was supported in whole with funds from the Division of Clinical Research (DCR), Division of Intramural Research (DIR) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), with subcontracts through National Cancer Institute (NCI), Contract No. 75N91019D00024.”
The paper provides a specific contract number (75N91019D00024) along with the funder name.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“All analyses were performed using R software, version 4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) or Stata, version 18.0 for windows.”
The paper names specific versions of software (R 4.3.0, Stata 18.0) used for analysis, as well as specific instruments and assays (e.g., RT-PCR, MRI, PROMIS) for data production. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
The paper does not mention any documentation object (README, data dictionary, codebook) that travels with the data, and the data are not released; variable definitions are only in the methods and supplementary materials, but not as a dedicated codebook. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.312
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0623
From 1 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
Intramural NIH HHS
Grant: ZIA AI001270
MeSH Terms