Using the linear references from the pangenome to discover missing autism variants is a dataset published in Nature Communications (2026). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.104, placing it in the top 62.1% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 2 times, with 2 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 35/100.
To better understand large-effect pathogenic variation associated with autism, we generated long-read sequencing (LRS) data to construct phased and near-complete genome assemblies (average contig N50 = 43 Mbp, QV = 56) for 189 individuals from 51 families with unsolved cases. We applied read- and assembly-based strategies to facilitate comprehensive characterization of de novo mutations, structural variants (SVs), and DNA methylation. Using LRS pangenome controls, we efficiently filtered >97% of common SVs exclusive to 87 offspring. We find no evidence of increased autosomal SV burden for probands when compared to unaffected siblings yet observe a suggestive trend toward an increased SV burden on the X chromosome among affected females. We establish a workflow to prioritize potential pathogenic variants by integrating autism risk genes and putative noncoding regulatory elements defined from ATAC-seq and CUT&Tag data from the developing cortex. In total, we identified three pathogenic variants in TBL1XR1, MECP2, and SYNGAP1, as well as nine candidate de novo and biallelic inherited homozygous SVs, most of which were missed by short-read sequencing. Our work highlights the potential of phased genomes to discover complex more pathogenic mutations and the power of the pangenome to restrict the focus on an increasingly smaller number of SVs for clinical evaluation.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.104
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
From 0 citing papers with measurable signal
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. None of the citing papers had measurable citation signal.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.