Integrative common and rare variant analyses provide insights into the genetic architecture of liver cirrhosis is a dataset published in Nature Genetics (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4, placing it in the top 14.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 63 times, with 56 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 58/100.
Ranks in the top 15% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“GCST90319877 and GCST90319878”
The paper provides accession numbers from the GWAS Catalog, which are persistent identifiers in an accepted scheme. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics are available at the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) (GCST90319877 and GCST90319878).”
The repository 'GWAS Catalog' is named as the holder of the data; it is a curated archive that issues accessions. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics are available at the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) (GCST90319877 and GCST90319878).”
The dataset identifier appears only in the body text (Data availability section), not as a reference-list entry. [majority verdict 'partial' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics are available at the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) (GCST90319877 and GCST90319878).”
The statement points at a repository record (GWAS Catalog with accession numbers), which is a persistent link to archived data. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not contain an itemised inventory of the dataset (no section, table, or list describing files, variables, or records); only the study's methods and findings are described. [majority verdict 'no' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics are available at the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) (GCST90319877 and GCST90319878).”
The text gives a route to the data with no stated precondition; the data are stated to be available at a repository with no mention of registration, payment, or embargo. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics are available at the GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) (GCST90319877 and GCST90319878).”
The paper does not label the access level (e.g., 'open access') but describes where to download the data, which is an action that implies accessibility. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The study's own data (GWAS summary statistics) are not sensitive and are openly available without a gatekeeper; the 'upon request' clause applies to other data, not the main dataset.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state when the data become available or how long they persist; no timing or retention commitment is made.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
No file format is named anywhere for the released data (summary statistics).
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS, an ontology) is named in the text; only generic terms like 'GWAS' are used.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“Data from the UKB samples are available through UKB ( https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ ).”
The text provides a repository URL for the UK Biobank, a resource the study depends on. [majority verdict 'yes' (3/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse licence is named for the data; the article's CC-BY licence applies to the paper, not the data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
Neither a version token nor a date is given to pin the snapshot of the data; the accessions are provided but no version is stated.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
Only third-party software is listed; the study's own code is not provided through any locator (no repository URL, DOI, or supplementary material).
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“NNF20SA0064340”
The acknowledgements include specific grant numbers (e.g., NNF20SA0064340) from named funders. [majority verdict 'yes' (4/5 passes agreed)]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“We used PLINK 2.0 (https://www.cog-genomics.org/plink/2.0/)”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific software tools (e.g., PLINK 2.0, METAL) used to produce the data, providing proper nouns and version information. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No README, data dictionary, or codebook is named to accompany the data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.624
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.766
From 29 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 56 citers.
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026556
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK131033
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025315
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026551
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023121
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026552
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026549
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025337
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025277
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026555
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026550
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026553
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD023205
BLRD VA
Grant: I01 BX003362
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: K08 DK113109
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026557
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026554
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023163
NIH HHS
Grant: U24 OD023176
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD026548
NCATS NIH HHS
Grant: UL1 TR001863
NIH HHS
Grant: U2C OD023196
NIGMS NIH HHS
Grant: T32 GM136651
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK134575
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD025276
NIH HHS
Grant: OT2 OD023206
NIDDK NIH HHS
Grant: R01 DK090066
FWCI
18.76
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals