A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI is a research paper published in Nature Medicine (2021). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 7.7. It has been cited 259 times, with 200 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.
Scored on demand from live citation data
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
We only score data papers we can read in full — never from an abstract alone.
Base Score Contribution
0.834
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
6.9
From 164 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 200 citers.
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: CL-2021-21-001
Medical Research Council
Grant: HDR-9002
Cancer Research UK
Grant: 27294
Cancer Research UK
Grant: C49297/A27294
Medical Research Council
Grant: MC_PC_18032
Medical Research Council
Grant: MC_PC_19005
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: NF-SI-0510-10186
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: NIHR-INF-0738
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Grant: NF-SI-0617-10038
Wellcome Trust
Grant: unidentified
unidentified
FWCI
7.91
Citation Percentile
1.0%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords
Additional file 1 of Image-based AI diagnostic performance for fatty liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 1 of Image-based AI diagnostic performance for fatty liver: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 1 of Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 1 of Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 2 of Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 2 of Artificial intelligence performance in detecting lymphoma from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Additional file 1 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 1 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 2 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 2 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 3 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 3 of A systematic review of radiomics in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): the potential of analysis on individual radiomics feature for identifying genuine promising imaging biomarkers
Additional file 1 of The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study
Additional file 1 of The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study
Additional file 2 of The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study
Additional file 2 of The endorsement of general and artificial intelligence reporting guidelines in radiological journals: a meta-research study