🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

A multi-modal single-cell and spatial expression map of metastatic breast cancer biopsies across clinicopathological features

Nature Medicine(2024)10.1038/s41591-024-03215-zSource: DataRank Database

A multi-modal single-cell and spatial expression map of metastatic breast cancer biopsies across clinicopathological features is a dataset published in Nature Medicine (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.1, placing it in the top 41.2% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 71 times, with 66 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 58/100.

Top 41%percentile
1.1DataRank
1.1Top 41%
Dataset Open Access71 citations · base score 3.9
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Although metastatic disease is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, its tumor microenvironment remains poorly characterized due to technical and biospecimen limitations. In this study, we assembled a multi-modal spatial and cellular map of 67 tumor biopsies from 60 patients with metastatic breast cancer across diverse clinicopathological features and nine anatomic sites with detailed clinical annotations. We combined single-cell or single-nucleus RNA sequencing for all biopsies with a panel of four spatial expression assays (Slide-seq, MERFISH, ExSeq and CODEX) and H&E staining of consecutive serial sections from up to 15 of these biopsies. We leveraged the coupled measurements to provide reference points for the utility and integration of different experimental techniques and used them to assess variability in cell type composition and expression as well as emerging spatial expression characteristics across clinicopathological and methodological diversity. Finally, we assessed spatial expression and co-localization features of macrophage populations, characterized three distinct spatial phenotypes of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and identified expression programs associated with local T cell infiltration versus exclusion, showcasing the potential of clinically relevant discovery in such maps.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    58FAIR score
    F Findable
    65
    A Accessible
    80
    I Interoperable
    38
    R Reusable
    50
    Top 8% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 54%Citation Network 46%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.581

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.486

    From 27 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences200555,906 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data
      Cell201916,515 citationsDataRank 1.5
    3. The Molecular Signatures Database Hallmark Gene Set Collection
      Cell Systems201514,282 citationsDataRank 17.1Top 9%
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 54% comes from its base citations and 46% from the citation network (27 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (62)

    Related Papers (10)

    Nature Medicine(2023)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1038/s41591-023-02327-2
    Nature Reviews Genetics(2023)
    co-cited
    10.1038/s41576-023-00586-w
    Nature Biotechnology(2021)
    co-cited
    10.1038/s41587-021-01001-7
    SSRN Electronic Journal(2024)
    co-cited
    10.2139/ssrn.4803291