🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

MISATO: machine learning dataset of protein–ligand complexes for structure-based drug discovery

Nature Computational Science(2024)10.1038/s43588-024-00627-2Source: DataRank Database

MISATO: machine learning dataset of protein–ligand complexes for structure-based drug discovery is a dataset published in Nature Computational Science (2024). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.4, placing it in the top 38.6% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 64 times, with 62 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 53/100.

Top 39%percentile
1.4DataRank
1.4Top 39%
Dataset Open Access64 citations · base score 3.8
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Large language models have greatly enhanced our ability to understand biology and chemistry, yet robust methods for structure-based drug discovery, quantum chemistry and structural biology are still sparse. Precise biomolecule-ligand interaction datasets are urgently needed for large language models. To address this, we present MISATO, a dataset that combines quantum mechanical properties of small molecules and associated molecular dynamics simulations of ~20,000 experimental protein-ligand complexes with extensive validation of experimental data. Starting from the existing experimental structures, semi-empirical quantum mechanics was used to systematically refine these structures. A large collection of molecular dynamics traces of protein-ligand complexes in explicit water is included, accumulating over 170 μs. We give examples of machine learning (ML) baseline models proving an improvement of accuracy by employing our data. An easy entry point for ML experts is provided to enable the next generation of drug discovery artificial intelligence models.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    53FAIR score
    F Findable
    65
    A Accessible
    68
    I Interoperable
    38
    R Reusable
    42
    Top 21% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 41%Citation Network 59%

    Base Score Contribution

    0.574

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    0.819

    From 39 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. Development and testing of a general amber force field
      Journal of Computational Chemistry200419,217 citationsDataRank 1.5
    2. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes
      Journal of Biomolecular NMR199516,271 citationsDataRank 1.5
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 41% comes from its base citations and 59% from the citation network (39 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (15)

    Filipe MenezesORCID,Sabrina Benassou,Kieran DidiORCID,André Santos Dias Mourão,Radosław KitelORCID