🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes

New England Journal of Medicine(2017)10.1056/nejmoa1611925Source: DataRank Database

Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes is a dataset published in New England Journal of Medicine (2017). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 17.7, placing it in the top 8.7% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 7,714 times, with 193 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 26/100.

Top 9%percentile
17.7DataRank
17.7Top 9%
Dataset Open Access7714 citations · base score 8.9
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Background Canagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor that reduces glycemia as well as blood pressure, body weight, and albuminuria in people with diabetes. We report the effects of treatment with canagliflozin on cardiovascular, renal, and safety outcomes. Methods The CANVAS Program integrated data from two trials involving a total of 10,142 participants with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. Participants in each trial were randomly assigned to receive canagliflozin or placebo and were followed for a mean of 188.2 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Results The mean age of the participants was 63.3 years, 35.8% were women, the mean duration of diabetes was 13.5 years, and 65.6% had a history of cardiovascular disease. The rate of the primary outcome was lower with canagliflozin than with placebo (occurring in 26.9 vs. 31.5 participants per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 0.97; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.02 for superiority). Although on the basis of the prespecified hypothesis testing sequence the renal outcomes are not viewed as statistically significant, the results showed a possible benefit of canagliflozin with respect to the progression of albuminuria (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.79) and the composite outcome of a sustained 40% reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, the need for renal-replacement therapy, or death from renal causes (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.77). Adverse reactions were consistent with the previously reported risks associated with canagliflozin except for an increased risk of amputation (6.3 vs. 3.4 participants per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.41 to 2.75); amputations were primarily at the level of the toe or metatarsal. Conclusions In two trials involving patients with type 2 diabetes and an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, patients treated with canagliflozin had a lower risk of cardiovascular events than those who received placebo but a greater risk of amputation, primarily at the level of the toe or metatarsal. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; CANVAS and CANVAS-R ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01032629 and NCT01989754 , respectively.).

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (1/3)
    • Dataset classification

    FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

    26FAIR score
    F Findable
    33
    A Accessible
    43
    I Interoperable
    13
    R Reusable
    17
    Top 92% by FAIRLLM-assessed✓ full text read

    Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →

    DataRank Breakdown

    Base Score 8%Citation Network 92%

    Base Score Contribution

    1.3

    From this paper's citation signal

    Citation Network Contribution

    16.4

    From 193 citing papers with measurable signal

    Learn more about DataRank methodology →

    Top 5 citers driving the network score

    Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(Cq) over citers.

    1. Regression Models and Life-Tables
      Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology197239,046 citationsDataRank 1.6
    2. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
      New England Journal of Medicine201511,839 citationsDataRank 1.4
    3. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
      European Heart Journal201810,320 citationsDataRank 1.4
    Why this DataRank?

    DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 8% comes from its base citations and 92% from the citation network (193 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

    Base score B(p)
    log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
    Network N(p)
    Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
    Damping factor d = 0.85
    DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
    Self-citations excluded
    Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

    Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

    Read the full methodology →

    Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

    Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank

    Authors (10)

    Vlado PerkovicORCID,Kenneth W. MahaffeyORCID,Dick de ZeeuwORCID,Greg Fulcher,Ngozi Erondu

    Related Papers (10)

    New England Journal of Medicine(2015)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa1504720
    New England Journal of Medicine(2016)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa1603827
    New England Journal of Medicine(2014)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa1409077
    New England Journal of Medicine(2008)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa0802987
    New England Journal of Medicine(2007)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa0706482
    New England Journal of Medicine(2008)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa0807646
    New England Journal of Medicine(2009)
    co-citedsame journal
    10.1056/nejmoa0904327