🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations

Journal of the American Statistical Association(1958)10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452Source: DataRank Database

Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations is a research paper published in Journal of the American Statistical Association (1958). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.7. It has been cited 70,170 times.

N/A
1.7DataRank · unranked
1.7
70170 citations · base score 11.2
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

Abstract In lifetesting, medical follow-up, and other fields the observation of the time of occurrence of the event of interest (called a death) may be prevented for some of the items of the sample by the previous occurrence of some other event (called a loss). Losses may be either accidental or controlled, the latter resulting from a decision to terminate certain observations. In either case it is usually assumed in this paper that the lifetime (age at death) is independent of the potential loss time; in practice this assumption deserves careful scrutiny. Despite the resulting incompleteness of the data, it is desired to estimate the proportion P(t) of items in the population whose lifetimes would exceed t (in the absence of such losses), without making any assumption about the form of the function P(t). The observation for each item of a suitable initial event, marking the beginning of its lifetime, is presupposed. For random samples of size N the product-limit (PL) estimate can be defined as follows: List and label the N observed lifetimes (whether to death or loss) in order of increasing magnitude, so that one has 0≤t 1ǐ≤t 2ǐ≤ … ≤t N ǐ. Then P(t)= II. [(N – r)/(N – r + 1)], where r assumes those values for which tr ≤t and for which tr ǐ measures the time to death. This estimate is the distribution, unrestricted as to form, which maximizes the likelihood of the observations. Other estimates that are discussed are the actuarial estimates (which are also products, but with the number of factors usually reduced by grouping); and reduced-sample (RS) estimates, which require that losses not be accidental, so that the limits of observation (potential loss times) are known even for those items whose deaths are observed. When no losses occur at ages less than t, the estimate of P(t) in all cases reduces to the usual binomial estimate, namely, the observed proportion of survivors.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (0/2)
    Interoperable (0/2)
      Reusable (0/3)

        FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

        DataRank Breakdown

        Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

        Base Score Contribution

        1.7

        From this paper's citation signal

        Citation Network Contribution

        0

        Citation network not refreshed for this result

        This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

        Learn more about DataRank methodology →
        Why this DataRank?

        DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

        Base score B(p)
        log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
        Network N(p)
        Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
        Damping factor d = 0.85
        DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
        Self-citations excluded
        Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

        Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

        Read the full methodology →

        Authors (3)

        Paul Meier,Edward L. Kaplan,E. L. Kaplan

        Related Papers (10)

        Regression Models and Life-Tables
        N/A
        1.6DataRank · unranked
        Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology(1972)
        co-cited
        10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x
        Journal of the American Statistical Association(1979)
        co-citedsame journal
        10.1080/01621459.1979.10481038
        An Analysis of Transformations
        N/A
        1.4DataRank · unranked
        Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology(1964)
        co-cited
        10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
        Journal of Educational Psychology(1974)
        co-cited
        10.1037/h0037350
        Nucleic Acids Research(2009)
        co-cited
        10.1093/nar/gkp335
        Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling(2015)
        co-cited
        10.1021/ci500747n
        International Journal of Computer Vision(2015)
        co-cited
        10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
        Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning(2009)
        co-cited
        10.1145/1553374.1553486