Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae is a research paper published in The Astrophysical Journal (1999). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.5. It has been cited 17,794 times.
Here we report measurements of the mass density, Ω<sub>M</sub>, and cosmological-constant energy density, Ω<sub>Λ</sub>, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these supernovae, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fitted jointly with a set of supernovae from the Calán/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to yield values for the cosmological parameters. All supernova peak magnitudes are standardized using a SN Ia light-curve width-luminosity relation. The measurement yields a joint probability distribution of the cosmological parameters that is approximated by the relation 0.8Ω<sub>M</sub>-0.6Ω<sub>Λ</sub>≈-0.2±0.1 in the region of interest (Ω<sub>M</sub>≲1.5). For a flat (Ω<sub>M</sub>+Ω<sub>Λ</sub>=1) cosmology we find Ω$_{M}^{flat}$=0.28$^{+0.09}_{-0.08}$ (1 σ statistical) $^{+0.05}_{-0.04}$ (identified systematics). The data are strongly inconsistent with a Λ=0 flat cosmology, the simplest inflationary universe model. An open, Λ=0 cosmology also does not fit the data well: the data indicate that the cosmological constant is nonzero and positive, with a confidence of P(Λ>0)=99%, including the identified systematic uncertainties. The best-fit age of the universe relative to the Hubble time is t$_{0}^{flat}$=14.9$^{+1.4}_{-1.1}$(0.63/h) Gyr for a flat cosmology. The size of our sample allows us to perform a variety of statistical tests to check for possible systematic errors and biases. We find no significant differences in either the host reddening distribution or Malmquist bias between the low-redshift Calán/Tololo sample and our high-redshift sample. Excluding those few supernovae that are outliers in color excess or fit residual does not significantly change the results. The conclusions are also robust whether or not a width-luminosity relation is used to standardize the supernova peak magnitudes. We discuss and constrain, where possible, hypothetical alternatives to a cosmological constant.
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Base Score Contribution
1.5
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0
Citation network not refreshed for this result
This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.
Learn more about DataRank methodology →DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.
Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.