🏆 Finalist — NIH Data Sharing Index (“S-Index”) Challenge
Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment(2008)10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008Source: DataRank Database

Fast unfolding of communities in large networks is a research paper published in Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment (2008). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 1.5. It has been cited 20,951 times.

N/A
1.5DataRank · unranked
1.5
Open Access20951 citations · base score 9.9
Cite:
datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

Abstract

We propose a simple method to extract the community structure of large networks. Our method is a heuristic method that is based on modularity optimization. It is shown to outperform all other known community detection methods in terms of computation time. Moreover, the quality of the communities detected is very good, as measured by the so-called modularity. This is shown first by identifying language communities in a Belgian mobile phone network of 2 million customers and by analysing a web graph of 118 million nodes and more than one billion links. The accuracy of our algorithm is also verified on ad hoc modular networks.

Data sources & pipeline
Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring
Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)
Findable (1/2)
  • Has DOI
Accessible (1/2)
  • Open Access
Interoperable (0/2)
    Reusable (0/3)

      FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

      DataRank Breakdown

      Base Score 100%Citation Network 0%

      Base Score Contribution

      1.5

      From this paper's citation signal

      Citation Network Contribution

      0

      Citation network not refreshed for this result

      This paper's DataRank is currently driven only by its base citation score. Citation network data was not refreshed for this result.

      Learn more about DataRank methodology →
      Why this DataRank?

      DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 100% comes from its base citations and 0% from the citation network.

      Base score B(p)
      log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
      Network N(p)
      Σ over citers of log1p(Cq) ÷ max(outdegreeq, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
      Damping factor d = 0.85
      DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
      Self-citations excluded
      Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

      Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

      Read the full methodology →

      Authors (5)

      Jean-Loup Guillaume,Renaud LambiotteORCID,Etienne Lefebvre,Jean‐Loup GuillaumeORCID,Vincent D. Blondel

      Related Papers (10)

      Journal of Open Source Software(2018)
      co-cited
      10.21105/joss.00861
      Nature Biotechnology(2015)
      co-cited
      10.1038/nbt.3192
      Nature Communications(2017)
      co-cited
      10.1038/ncomms14049
      Bioinformatics(2013)
      co-cited
      10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635