Demo corpus. Scores are computed on a select set of biomedical paper/datasets and may be inaccurate for papers outside this corpus — DataRank relies on network effects that improve with scale. We aim to expand this into a fully open resource pending additional funding.

Sensitivity Analyses of Exposure Estimates from a Quantitative Job-exposure Matrix (SYN-JEM) for Use in Community-based Studies

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene(2012)10.1093/annhyg/mes045Source: DataRank Database

Sensitivity Analyses of Exposure Estimates from a Quantitative Job-exposure Matrix (SYN-JEM) for Use in Community-based Studies is a research paper published in The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (2012). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.699. It has been cited 18 times, with 6 citing works in its 1-hop citation network.

N/A

0.699DataRank · unranked

0.699

18 citations · base score 2.9

Cite:

datarank_citation_only_1hop_v6· scope data_onlyMethodology

›Data sources & pipeline

Pipeline:MetadataData-paper checkEnrichmentCitation networkScoring

Enrichment:Pending

FAIR Checklist

Context only (not used in score)

Findable (1/2)

Has DOI

Accessible (0/2)

Interoperable (0/2)

Reusable (0/3)

FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.

Run a calibrated FAIR evaluation for this paper →

DataRank Breakdown

Base Score 63%Citation Network 37%

Base Score Contribution

0.442

From this paper's citation signal

Citation Network Contribution

0.257

From 5 citing papers with measurable signal

Learn more about DataRank methodology →

Top 1 citer driving the network score

Ranked by citation count — the same ordering the engine uses when summing log1p(C_q) over citers.

Characterization of Dust Exposure for the Study of Chronic Occupational Lung Disease: A Comparison of Different Exposure Assessment Strategies
American Journal of Epidemiology200056 citationsDataRank 3.5

Why this DataRank?

DataRank blends this paper's own citation count with the influence of the papers that cite it. Here, roughly 63% comes from its base citations and 37% from the citation network (5 citing papers contributed measurable signal).

Base score B(p): log1p(citation_count) — grows sub-linearly, so a paper with 1,000 citations is not 10× a paper with 100.
Network N(p): Σ over citers of log1p(C_q) ÷ max(outdegree_q, 1). Being cited by a highly-cited paper with few references counts most.
Damping factor d = 0.85: DataRank = (1−d)·B(p) + d·N(p) — the two cards above are each already multiplied by their share.
Self-citations excluded: Citers sharing any OpenAlex author ID with this paper are filtered out before the network sum.

Citers are pulled from OpenAlex sorted by cited_by_count:descand capped per paper, so when the cap binds we keep the highest-signal references and the score is reproducible across reruns.

Read the full methodology →

Click a node to highlight its connections. Use scroll to zoom. Drag to pan.

Node colors:CenterData PaperData + Open AccessNon-dataSelected & links| Node size = percentile rank