Learning single-cell chromatin accessibility profiles using meta-analytic marker genes is a dataset published in Briefings in Bioinformatics (2022). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.315, placing it in the top 53.5% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 4 times, with 4 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 50/100.
Ranks in the top 54% for downstream scientific impact
Linked data & code
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
“https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC”
The paper gives a web URL for the data, not a persistent identifier scheme (DOI, Handle, etc.).
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
“Meta scATAC-seq server”
The data are hosted on a lab server (gillisweb.cshl.edu), which is not a curated repository from re3data/FAIRsharing.
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
“https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC/”
The dataset identifier appears only in the body text (Data Availability section), not in the reference list.
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
“Source codes and marker gene sets are available at https://github.com/carushi/Catactor . Pseudo-bulk profiles of all collected data are published at Meta scATAC-seq server https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC/ .”
The statement provides URLs to archived data but does not point to a repository record with a persistent identifier.
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
“Their meta scATAC-seq profiles are publicly available at https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC .”
The dataset is described only in running prose; no itemized inventory of files or variables is provided.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
“Their meta scATAC-seq profiles are publicly available at https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC .”
The paper provides a direct URL with no stated precondition for access.
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
“publicly available”
The paper states the data are publicly available, which is an explicit access-level label.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The data are from mouse brain and no human subjects or sensitive data are mentioned; no gatekeeper is named.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
“Meta scATAC-seq profiles are publicly available at https://gillisweb.cshl.edu/Meta_scATAC”
The paper states the data are available now but does not specify a retention period. [majority verdict 'partial' (3/5 passes agreed)]
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not specify the file format of the released data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
No data or metadata community standard (e.g., MIAME, BIDS) is named for the released data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
“The corresponding GEO IDs of the collected studies are GSE100033, GSE111586, GSE123576, GSE127257, GSE126074 and GSE130399.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper provides GEO accession numbers for the external datasets it used, which are identifiers of resources other than its own data. [downgraded to 'no' — no verifiable quote from the paper] [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
No reuse license is stated for the data; the CC BY-NC license applies only to the article.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
No version token or date is given for the released data.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
“Source codes and marker gene sets are available at https://github.com/carushi/Catactor”
The paper provides a GitHub repository URL for the code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“JG and RKK were supported by NIH grants R01MH113005 and R01LM012736.”
The paper lists specific grant numbers for the funding.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“A general pre-processing, filtering, clustering, and detection of cluster-specific genes was performed on a SCANPY platform.”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper names specific software (SCANPY) used in data processing. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
No README, data dictionary, or codebook is mentioned as accompanying the data.
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.241
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.0738
From 3 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 4 citers.
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01MH113005
National Institutes of Health
Grant: R01LM012736
NCI NIH HHS
Grant: P30 CA045508
NIMH NIH HHS
Grant: U19 MH114821
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01LM012736-02
Heuristics to evaluate biomedical and genomic knowledge bases for validity
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U19MH114821-05
A Comprehensive Center for Mouse Brain Cell Atlas
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01MH113005-02
Revealing the transcriptomic basis of neuronal identity through functional meta-analysis
FWCI
0.31
Citation Percentile
0.5%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
MeSH Terms
Keywords