Heart rate variability and risk of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study is a dataset published in Brain Communications (2023). On theSindex it has a DataRank of 0.667, placing it in the top 29.9% of the data-sharing corpus. It has been cited 18 times, with 14 citing works in its 1-hop citation network. Its calibrated FAIR score is 2/100.
Ranks in the top 30% for downstream scientific impact
DataRank reads this dataset's downstream impact straight off the citation graph — no black box, no proprietary weighting. How is this computed?
FAIR checklist signals are shown for context only and do not affect DataRank scoring.
Full FAIR picture · advisory
The headline score is computed from the scored criteria — the fact-shaped checks (a repository, an accession, a licence) that two independent models agree on. The advisory criteria below are real FAIR guidance but rest on judgment calls that models read differently, so they inform without moving the number.
The paper does not assign any persistent identifier to the study's own dataset. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F1-01D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a persistent identifier' (priorit · RDA-F1-02D — FAIR Data Maturity Model: 'Data is identified by a globally unique identifier' · FsF-F1-02D — F-UJI/FAIRsFAIR: 'Data is assigned a persistent identifier'
The paper does not name a repository for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-F4-01M — FAIR Data Maturity Model: metadata is offered so it can be harvested and indexed ( · NIH DMS Policy Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — name the repository where data will be archived · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Long-Term Sustainability', 'Reten
The paper does not cite the study's own dataset in the reference list or body text. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
FORCE11 Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles (2014) — data should be cited as a first- · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes · FsF-F3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes the identifier of the data it describes'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not contain a data availability statement for the study's own data; it only points to the source ARIC data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
Colavizza, Hrynaszkiewicz, Staden, Whitaker & McGillivray (2020), 'The citation advantage of li · Springer Nature research data policy — Data Availability Statements: standard statement templat · RDA-F3-01M — metadata clearly and explicitly includes the identifier of the data it describes
The paper does not provide an itemised inventory of the study's own dataset.
RDA-F2-01M — 'Rich metadata is provided to allow discovery' (priority Essential) · FsF-F2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes descriptive core elements to support data findability' · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data'
The paper provides no route to obtain the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-A1.1-01D — 'Data is accessible through a free access protocol' · FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Free and Easy Access'
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not label the access level of the study's own data.
FsF-A1-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata contains access level and access conditions of the data' · RDA-A1-01M — metadata contains information to enable the user to get access to the data · COAR Controlled Vocabularies — Access Rights v1.0 (open / embargoed / restricted / metadata-onl
The paper does not name any gatekeeper for the study's own data.
NIH Genomic Data Sharing Policy (NOT-OD-14-124) — controlled-access via a Data Access Committee · RDA-A1.2-01D — 'Data is accessible through an access protocol that supports authentication and · NIH DMS Policy Element 5 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Access, Distribution, or Reuse Considerations (conse
The paper does not state a retention timeline for the study's own data.
NIH DMS Plan Element 4 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Data Preservation, Access, and Associated Timelines · NSTC Desirable Characteristics (2022), Organizational Infrastructure: 'Retention Policy' · RDA-A2-01M — 'Metadata is guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available'
The paper does not name any file format for the study's own data.
FsF-R1.3-02D — F-UJI: 'Data is available in a file format recommended by the target research co · RDA-R1.3-02D — data is expressed in a machine-understandable community standard · RDA-I1-01D — data uses a knowledge representation expressed in a standardised format
Advisory · not in the published score
The paper does not name a data or metadata community standard applied to the study's own data.
RDA-R1.3-01M — 'Metadata complies with a community standard' (priority Essential) · RDA-R1.3-01D — 'Data complies with a community standard' · RDA-I2-01M — '(Meta)data use vocabularies that follow FAIR principles'
The paper does not provide an identifier for any external resource that the study's data depend on.
RDA-I3-01M — '(meta)data include references to other (meta)data' · RDA-I3-03M — 'metadata includes qualified references to other metadata' · FsF-I3-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes links between the data and its related entities'
The paper does not attach a reuse license to the study's own data.
RDA-R1.1-01M — 'Metadata includes information about the licence under which the data can be reu · RDA-R1.1-02M — 'Metadata refers to a standard reuse licence' · RDA-R1.1-03M — 'Metadata refers to a machine-understandable reuse licence'
The paper does not state a version token or date for the study's own dataset.
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — the 'Version' property · RDA-R1.2-01M — provenance information (which version was used is provenance) · NSTC Desirable Characteristics of Data Repositories (2022) — 'Provenance', 'Retention Policy'
The paper does not provide a machine-resolvable locator for the study's own code.
NIH DMS Policy Element 2 (NOT-OD-21-014) — 'Related Tools, Software and/or Code' · FAIR4RS Principles v1.0 (Chue Hong et al., 2022; RDA/FORCE11/ReSA) — FAIR Principles for Resear · FORCE11 Software Citation Principles (Smith, Katz & Niemeyer, 2016, PeerJ CS 2:e86)
“K.Y.L. is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/S021418/1).”— not found in the paper; verdict downgraded
The paper includes an award number (MR/S021418/1) for the funding of the work. [downgraded to 'partial' — no verifiable quote from the paper]
DataCite Metadata Schema 4.6 — 'FundingReference' property (funderName, funderIdentifier, award · Crossref Funder Registry — canonical funder identifiers for funding metadata · RDA-F2-01M — rich metadata provided to allow discovery (funding is part of the descriptive reco
Advisory · not in the published score
“HRV measures were obtained at Visits 1–5 from resting, supine, 10-s, standard 12-lead ECGs: root mean square of successive differences in R–R intervals (RMSSD) and standard deviation of normal-to-normal R–R intervals (SDNN).”
The paper describes the methods for generating the source data (HRV from ECGs) but not for the study's own derived data. [majority verdict 'no' (2/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1.2-01M — 'Metadata includes provenance information according to community- specific standa · FsF-R1.2-01M — F-UJI: 'Metadata includes provenance information about data creation or generati · W3C PROV-O (W3C Recommendation, 2013) — the entity/activity/agent model of provenance
The paper does not include a documentation object shipped with the data or a variable-definition table inside the article for the study's own data. [majority verdict 'no' (4/5 passes agreed)]
RDA-R1-01M — '(Meta)data are richly described with a plurality of accurate and relevant attribu · FsF-R1-01MD — F-UJI: 'Metadata specifies the content of the data' · NIH DMS Policy Element 3 (NOT-OD-21-014) — Standards (documentation and metadata to accompany t
Calibrated FAIR score — a parallel quality metric, independent of the DataRank citation score. See the full evaluation →
Base Score Contribution
0.442
From this paper's citation signal
Citation Network Contribution
0.226
From 7 citing papers with measurable signal
Ranked by each citer's contribution to N(p) — log1p(Cq) divided by its reference count — out of 14 citers.
UK Medical Research Council
Grant: MR/S021418/1
Does the central noradrenergic system play a role in agitation in Alzheimer's disease?
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: HHSN268201700001I
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: HHSN268201700002I
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: HHSN268201700003I
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: HHSN268201700004I
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: HHSN268201700005I
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: 2U01HL096812
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: 2U01HL096814
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: 2U01HL096899
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: 2U01HL096902
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Grant: 2U01HL096917
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Grant: R01-HL70825
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: U01 HL096917
NHLBI NIH HHS
Grant: R01 HL070825
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01HL096812-08
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) 1 of 5
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01HL096814-02
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 2U01HL096917-05
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) Renewal 2 of 5
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5R01HL070825-03
The ARIC and Neurocognitive Longitudinal Study
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01HL096899-02
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)
National Institutes of Health
Grant: 5U01HL096902-06
ARIC Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS)
National Institute on Aging
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
FWCI
3.20
Citation Percentile
0.9%
Citation Trend
Fields of Study
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals